Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. Le Bourgeois, 23 So. 542.

44 citing documents.

Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
591, (1898); Comment, The Action of Nullity Under Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2004, 38 La.L.Rev.
Smith v. Alliance Compressors 922 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Adrinner Smith v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Collins v. Estrade 638 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
591 , (1898); Comment, The Action of Nullity Under Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2004, 38 La.L.Rev.
Gardebled v. Georgia Pacific Corp. 506 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
591 , ; Tarver v. Quinn, 149 La.
Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield 434 So. 2d 1067 La. 1983
591 , (1898); Comment, The Action of Nullity Under Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2004, 38 La.L.Rev.
Brown v. Brown 430 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
591 , (1898); cf. Bell v. Holdcraft, 196 So.
Murray v. Housing Authority of St. Charles Parish 425 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Succession of Skye 364 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Johnson v. Jones-Journet 320 So. 2d 533 La. 1975
591 , (1898); Lazarus v. McGuirk, 42 La.Ann.
Roy v. Griffith 306 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1974
591 , (1898); cf. Bell v. Holdcraft, 196 So.
Johnson v. Jones-Journet 306 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
591 , , “even though no actual fraud or intentional wrong is shown in the procurement of the judgment,” Leidig v. Leidig, La.App.1966, .
Johnston v. Smith 284 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Licoho Enterprises, Inc. v. Succession of Champagne 270 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
[591,] 592, .’ See also Alonso v. Bowers, 222 La.
McKinney v. Levy 212 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
591 , ; Weinberger Sales Co. v. Truett, La.App., ; and Bell v. Holdcraft, 196 So.
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Martens 192 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
[591,] 592, .” See also Alonso v. Bowers, 222 La.
Dare v. Myrick 168 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
591 , (1898); Tarver v. Quinn, 149 La.
Webb v. Carlton 165 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company 158 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
591 , ; Tarver v. Quinn, 149 La.
Gumina v. Dupas 159 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
591 , ; cf. Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App., 196 So.
Pfeiffer v. Hemisphere International Corporation 153 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
591 , ; Vinson v. Picolo, La.App., ; Sandfield Oil & Gas.
Lewis v. Bell 137 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Brooks v. Griggs Casing Crews, Inc. 136 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Hall v. Hall 127 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
591 , ; Lazarus v. McGuirk, 42 La.Ann.
Collins v. Rambo 123 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
591 , ; Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App.
Succession of Menendez 115 So. 2d 829 La. 1959
Miller v. Rollins 111 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
379 , a decision by this court, , 23 So.
Succession of Kippers 91 So. 2d 346 La. 1956
Vegas v. Cheramie 80 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
591 , ; Tarver v. Quinn, 149 La.
Wilkinson v. Wilkinson 79 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Alonso v. Bowers 64 So. 2d 443 La. 1953
591 , ; Tarver v. Quinn, 149 La.
King v. Burris 57 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
591 , : “Our courts have not hesitated to-afford relief against judgments irrespective-of any issue of inattention or neglect, when the circumstances under which the judgment is rendered show the deprivation of the legal rights of the litigant who seeks, relief, and when the enforcement of the judgment would be unconscienti
Star Shoe Co. v. Hendricks 45 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Vinson v. Picolo 15 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Sandfield Oil Gas Co. v. Paul 7 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Bell v. Holdcraft 196 So. 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
591 , , the Court said: “our courts have not hesitated to afford relief against judgments irrespective of any issue of inattention or neglect, when the circumstances under which the judgment is rendered show the deprivation of the legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief, and when the enforcement of the judgment would
Succession of Robinson 172 So. 429 La. 1936
Hanson v. Haynes 170 So. 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Burthe v. Lee 152 So. 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
“ ‘Our courts have not hesitated to afford relief against judgments, irrespective of any issue of inattention or neglect, when the circumstances under which the judgment is rendered show the deprivation of the legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief, and when the enforcement of the judgment would be unconscionable and inequitable.’ , 23 So.
Engeran v. Consolidated Companies 147 So. 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Morgan v. Leone 129 So. 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Ann. 592 , ; Miller vs. Miller, 156 La.
Succession of Gilmore 102 So. 94 La. 1924
Miller v. Miller 100 So. 45 La. 1924
Nessans v. Colomes 57 So. 1010 La. 1912
“Our courts have not hesitated to afford relief against judgments, irrespective of any issue of inattention or neglect, when the circumstances under which the judgment is rendered show the deprivation of the legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief, and when the enforcement of the judgment would be unconscionable and inequitable.” , 23 South.