Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Zeigler v. His Creditors, 21 So. 666.

15 citing documents.

Pringle-Associated Mortgage Corporation v. Eanes 226 So. 2d 502 La. 1969
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Marquette Casualty Co. 143 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
144 , ; Duchamp v. Widow Dantilly, 9 La.Ann.
RF MESTAYER LUMBER COMPANY v. Cusack 141 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
144 , ; Duchamp v. Dantilly, 9 La.Ann.
Olevia v. Rusciana 13 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
White System of Alexandria v. Fitzhugh 5 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
144, 188 , ; Walmsley v. Theus, 107 La.
Union Bldg. Corporation v. Burmeister 173 So. 752 La. 1937
The intention to novate must “clearly result from the terms of the agreement, or by a full discharge of the original debt,” (article 2190, Rev.Civ.Code) and that “the taking of a new note in renewal of one secured by mortgage operates no novation, * * * where the first was not surrendered by the creditor,” ( , 21 So.
Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Thomson 171 So. 553 La. 1936
Comeaux v. Savoy 146 So. 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
We do not understand that counsel for defendant disputes the correctness of this proposition which is in line with the following ruling of the court, , 21 So.
Decuir v. Carnes 138 So. 103 La. 1931
Decuir v. Carnes 132 So. 259 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1931
Tridico v. Merenda 120 So. 857 La. 1929
Craft v. Leibe 56 So. 505 La. 1911
Mrs. Grant caused the interest of her minor children to be adjudicated to her UDder article 343, O. G. One of the objections which defendant makes to the title is that the title of plaintiff to the one-sixth interest which Mrs. Grant acquired by the testament of her husband is defeasible, it being conditioned on the nonremarriage of Mrs. Grant (article 1753, C. C.; , 21 South.
Zeigler v. His Creditors 40 So. 693 La. 1906
The decision in Zeigler v. His Creditors, in , 21 South.
Trezevant v. Levy's Heirs 38 So. 589 La. 1905
Hayward v. Hayward 38 So. 424 La. 1905