Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Patton v. Pickles, 24 So. 290.
-
Llorens v. City of Alexandria
106 So. 2d 342
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
slightest, neglect.’ * * * ‘The burden of proof is on the defendants to establish that there has been no disregard whatever of their duties, and that the damage has resulted from a cause which human care and foresight could not prevent.’ ” This holding has been definitely adhered to in a long line of cases, of which the following are some of the most prominent early decisions: , 24 So.
- Wallace v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 175 So. 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
-
Alford v. Bisso Ferry Co.
161 So. 368
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Ann. S57, ; Moses v. R. R. *373 Co., 30 La.
- Upton v. Bell Cabs, Inc. 154 So. 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
-
Johnston v. City of Monroe
147 So. 519
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Ann. 864 , , Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., 150 La.
-
Bacon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
137 So. 213
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Ann. S57, 864, ; Brisolara v. Caddo-Tr.
- Martin v. Interurban Transportation Co. 131 So. 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- Thomas v. Shreveport Railways Co. 13 La. App. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
-
Livaudais v. Black
127 So. 129
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
287 ; Patton vs. Pickles, , 24 So.
-
Guidry v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.
6 La. App. 169
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
(O. S.) 681 -682; Patton vs. Pickles, , 24 South.
-
Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co.
90 So. 512
La. 1922
Ann. 377 ; *73 , 24 South.
- Haynes v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. 74 So. 538 La. 1917
-
Williams v. Union Ferry Co.
52 So. 678
La. 1910
24 South, 290 ; Julien v. Wade Hampton, 27 La.
- Wood v. Monteleone 43 So. 657 La. 1907
-
McGinn v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.
43 So. 450
La. 1907
We have had occasion several times to refer to that article of the Code noting that the article refers to “things” intrusted to the care of the carrier, and not to “persons.” , 24 South.