Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Marceaux, 24 So. 611.
- State v. Fullilove 389 So. 2d 1282 La. 1980
- State v. Forbes 348 So. 2d 983 La. 1977
-
State v. Bentley
54 So. 2d 137
La. 1951
1137 , ; State v. Robinson, 112 La.
-
State v. Hoover
54 So. 2d 130
La. 1951
1137 , ; State v. Robinson, 112 La.
-
State v. Richardson
144 So. 587
La. 1932
811 , it was said: “When the district attorney has commented before the jury on the failure of the accused to testify in his own behalf, the verdict will be set aside, even though the judge instructed the jury to dismiss the comment from their minds, and not to permit themselves to be influenced by it, or by the failure of the accused to testify.” , 24 So.
- State v. Dreher 118 So. 85 La. 1928
- State v. Liner 116 So. 712 La. 1928
- State v. Glauson 115 So. 484 La. 1928
-
State v. Broughton
105 So. 59
La. 1925
It is absurd, therefore, to suppose that any judicial declaration will remove the effect of language which has found lodgment in the minds of jurors, spent its force, and subserved its purpose of creating a prejudice against the accused.” See, also, , 24 So.
- State v. Johnson 75 So. 678 La. 1917
- State v. Williams 50 So. 648 La. 1909
- State v. Gordon 39 So. 625 La. 1905
-
State v. Hopper
38 So. 452
La. 1905
890 , 1 and authorities cited; , 24 South.