Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Magbee v. Federal Express, 105 So. 3d 1048.

21 citing documents.

Beatrice Joseph v. Iberia Parish School District La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 12/12/02), Harrington v. Coastal Constr.
Kenneth Clark v. Walgreens Drugstore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Clark v. Sedgwick CMS 247 So. 3d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Bonnie Conner v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/12/12), held that the WCJ erred in awarding statutory attorney fees based only on those issues for which penalties were awarded.
Conner v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Co. 185 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/12/12) , , held that the WCJ erred in awarding statutory attorney fees based only on those issues for which penalties were awarded.
Tracy Bowie v. Westside Habilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Bowie v. Westside Habilitation Center 150 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 3 Cir. 12/12/12), .
Travis Davis v. Boise Cascade Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 12/12/12), (citing LeBlanc v. Lafayette Consol.
Davis v. Boise Cascade Co. 149 So. 3d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 12/12/12) , (citing LeBlanc v. Lafayette Consol.
Terry Lee Johnson, Sr. v. Lynn Edward Foret, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 12/12/12), and Racca v. Acme Truck Lines, Inc., 12-1319 (La.App.
Johnson v. Foret 146 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 12/12/12) , and Racca v. Acme Truck Lines, Inc., 12-1319 (La.App.
Kennen Daniel v. Point to Point Directional Drilling, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Daniel v. Point to Point Directional Drilling, Inc. 139 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Lafayette Steel Erector, Inc. v. James Constance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 12/12/12), Constance counters that an attorney fee award should be based on his attorney‟s efforts in regard to the entire litigation rather than on only the time spent on penalty-related issues.
Lafayette Steel Erector, Inc. v. Constance 137 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 12/12/12) , , Constance counters that an attorney fee award should be based on his attorney’s efforts in regard to the entire litigation rather than on only the time spent on penalty-related issues.
Dena Romero v. Garan's, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 12/12/12), (quoting LeMelle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 04-527, pp. 10-11 (La.App.
John Carriere v. Patients Care Medical Supply La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 12/12/12), Carriere argues that the WCJ erred in limiting the attorney fees awarded to the penalty for which he prevailed at trial.
Carriere v. Patient's Care Medical Supply 127 So. 3d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 12/12/12) , , Carriere argues that the WCJ erred in limiting the attorney fees awarded to the penalty for which he prevailed at trial.
Auta B. Highsmith, Et Ux v. Lynn Edward Foret, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 12/12/12), and Racca v. Acme Truck Lines, Inc., 12-1319 (La.App.
Valerie Fabacher v. Stine, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 12/12/12), this court again addressed the issue of whether the statutory attorney fee should be based on only the time spent on the penalty-related issues or on the entire litigation, and concluded that the supreme court decision in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.
Fabacher v. Stine, Inc. 124 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 12/12/12) , , this court again addressed the issue of whether the statutory attorney fee should be based on only the time spent on the penalty-related issues or on the entire litigation and concluded that the supreme court decision in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), , required the latter r