State v. Doax
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 10, 1964 166 So. 2d 328; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 6, 1964 159 So. 2d 347; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 3, 1927 6 La. App. 550; La., July 15, 1884 36 La. Ann. 828
State v. Doax, 70 La. Ann. 77 (1867).
Opinion text
Hyman, C. J. The State is appellant from a judgment dismissing suit brought against defendants, on an appearance bond signed only by Gay, as security for Doax and Thompson. , Doax and Thompson, not having signed the bond, are not bound. Neither is Gay bound on the bond, for there cannot be an accessory obligation where there is not a principal one. See 2 Rob. 367 , Curtis et al v. Moss. Let the jiidgment of the District Court be affirmed.