Hutchinson v. Richardson
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 1, 1964 170 So. 2d 188; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 3, 1964 160 So. 2d 345; La., July 15, 1886 38 La. Ann. 688; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., October 27, 1964 168 So. 2d 457
Hutchinson v. Richardson, 70 La. Ann. 187 (1867).
Opinion text
Howei/d, J. This is an action upon a promissory note, duo on 12th January, 1859, against which the prescription of five years is pleaded by H. Richardson, against whom alone judgment was rendered. He accepted service of the petition on the 10th January, I860, about seven years after the maturity of the note sued on, and there is no legal evidence in the record showing an interruption or suspension of the prescription pleaded. *188 It is therefore ordered, that the judgment appealed from be reversed, and that there bo judgment in favor of defendant, Ilardy Richardson, with costs in both courts.