Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Downing v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railway & Steamship Co., 104 La. 508.
- Dixie Machine Welding & Metal Works, Inc. v. Illinois Central Railroad 285 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
-
McFarland v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
122 So. 2d 845
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
In Downing v. Morgan's L. & T. Railway & S. S. Company, , 29 So.
-
Audubon Ins. Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
68 So. 2d 232
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
The case of Downing v. Morgan’s T. & L. R. R. & S. S. Co., , 29 So.
- James v. Thompson 35 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
- Levy v. White 5 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
-
Sizemore v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co.
164 So. 648
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
& S. S. Co., , 29 So.
-
Natal v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co.
137 So. 600
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1931
In fact, in discussing the reason for the decision in both cases, the Supreme Court in the Lampkin Case, which was the later of the two, said: “This case resembles, in a number of its features, that of Downing v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. (recently decided by this court) [ ] 29 So.
-
Polizzi v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.
131 So. 611
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
952 ; Downing v. Morgan’s Co., , 29 So.
-
Hight v. Casanas
6 La. App. 30
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
& S. S. Co., , 29 So.
-
Johnson v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.
5 La. App. 649
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In Downing vs. Rrd., , 29 So.
-
Foreman v. Louisiana Western Ry. Co.
73 So. 242
La. 1916
In the Ortolano Case, the court say: “We repeat what was said in the Downing Case, , 22 South.
-
Platt v. Vicksburg, S. & Pacific Ry. Co.
64 So. 282
La. 1914
Learned counsel cites three of the decisions of this court: The Downing Case, , 29 South.
- Lewis v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co. 38 So. 92 La. 1905
-
Gilliam v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
38 So. 166
La. 1905
33 S. W. 437 ; , 29 South.
- Mitchell v. Illinois Cent. R. 34 So. 714 La. 1903