Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sharp v. Zeller, 34 So. 129.

32 citing documents.

Succession of Andrew M. Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Succession of Moore 946 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
61, (wherein the court stated that Zeller was authorized to apply the rents of the property to the mortgage, using only the balance as profits for the benefit of the community).
Clementine Fairrow v. James E. Marves La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Fairrow v. Marves 862 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Wood v. Wood 424 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Phillips v. Nereaux 357 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Cookmeyer v. Cookmeyer 354 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
First, the interest on the separate debt on a husband's income-producing separate property is chargeable to the community; Sharp v. Zeller, 1902, , 34 So.
Barnett v. Barnett 339 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Primeaux v. Libersat 307 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Hurta v. Melcher 260 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Interest on a separate debt is chargeable to the community where the debt is part of the price of (or secured by mortgage on) separate property which itself produces revenue; , 34 So.
Moore v. Moore 255 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Gouaux v. Gouaux 211 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
The rights of the husband to reimbursement from the community for the use of his separate funds for the benefit of the community does not come into existence until the community is dissolved, , 34 So.
Harris v. Harris 160 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Beatty v. Vining 147 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Locantro v. Petrie 144 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Chrisentery v. Chrisentery 124 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Lazaro v. Lazaro 92 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Coney v. Coney 56 So. 2d 841 La. 1951
Coney v. Coney 56 So. 2d 841 La. 1951
Slaton v. King 36 So. 2d 648 La. 1948
Slaton v. King 30 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Succession of Brunies 25 So. 2d 287 La. 1946
“* * * the community, enjoying, as it did, the usufruct of the wife’s landed estate, ought, in good conscience, to be • chargeable with the taxes on the same.” , 34 So.
Succession of Ratcliff 24 So. 2d 456 La. 1945
Baker v. Baker 21 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Sanderson v. Frost 3 So. 2d 626 La. 1941
Adkins v. Cason 170 So. 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Kittredge v. Grau 103 So. 723 La. 1925
Succession of Goll 101 So. 263 La. 1924
Succession of Watkins 101 So. 395 La. 1924
Ramsey v. Beck 91 So. 674 La. 1922
Succession of Andrus 60 So. 623 La. 1913
McWilliams v. Stair 55 So. 343 La. 1911