Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite LeBlanc v. Sweet, 107 La. 355.

27 citing documents.

Shelts v. Jackson 254 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Deason v. Greyhound Corporation 106 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Llorens v. City of Alexandria 106 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Edwards v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 185 So. 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Wallace v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 175 So. 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Alford v. Bisso Ferry Co. 161 So. 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Upton v. Bell Cabs, Inc. 154 So. 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Dinet v. Orleans Dredging Co., Inc. 149 So. 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Johnston v. City of Monroe 147 So. 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Bacon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 137 So. 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Ritchie v. N. O. Public Service, Inc. 132 So. 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
The authorities relied upon by plaintiff, , 31 So.
Brisolara v. Caddo-Transfer & Warehouse Co. 127 So. 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
74-77; LeBlanc & Wife vs. Sweet et al., , 31 So.
Thomas v. Shreveport Railways Co. 13 La. App. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
514 ; LeBlanc vs. Sweet, , 31 So.
Baptiste v. N. O. Pub. Service, Inc. 127 So. 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
LeBlanc vs. Sweet et al„ , 31 So.
Livaudais v. Black 127 So. 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
See, also, Le Blanc vs. Sweet, , 31 So.
Cusimano v. N. O. Pub. Service, Inc. 122 So. 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
I am convinced that the finding in the Hopkins case did not require the statement quoted from Le Blanc vs. Sweet, , 31 So.
Rizzo v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co. 7 La. App. 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
LeBlanc vs. Sweet, , 31 South.
Shally v. N O. Public Service & Sewerage & Water Board 1 La. App. 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
In the case of Le Blanc vs. Sweet, , 31 South.
Fink v. Lancaster 5 Pelt. 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1922
431 ; 27 A. 377 ; 34 A. 145 ; 37 A. 705 , 648, 694; 38 A. Ill; 39 A. 649 ; 40 A. 417 ; 44 A. 1059 ; 47 A. 1107 ; 50 A. 864 ; ; 110 La.
Hebert v. Baton Rouge Electric Co. 91 So. 406 La. 1922
Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co. 90 So. 512 La. 1922
It is then for the carrier, and not the passenger, to show what negligence and whose prevented the fulfillment of the contractual obligations of the carrier.” , 31 South.
Thompson v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. 87 So. 716 La. 1921
Hamilton v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. 85 So. 611 La. 1920
Clogher v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. 78 So. 247 La. 1917
Haynes v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. 74 So. 538 La. 1917
Bourg v. Brownell-Drews Lumber Co. 45 So. 972 La. 1908
In Le Blanc & , 31 South.
Jackson v. Natchez & W. Ry. Co. 38 So. 701 La. 1905
But the taking of evidence will be restricted to that single point, and the burden will not be on plaintiff to show the negligence, but on defendant to show the absence of it ( , 31 South.