Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hake v. Lee, 106 La. 482.

15 citing documents.

Guilbeau v. Jeanerette Lumber & Shingle Co. 232 So. 2d 67 La. 1970
Jones v. Jones 121 So. 2d 734 La. 1960
Tyson v. York 188 So. 33 La. 1939
Hake v. Lee & Beall, , 31 So.
Ramsey v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. 123 So. 114 La. 1929
Hake v. Lee & Beall, , 31 So.
Burch v. Theriot 6 Pelt. 351 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1923
Hake v. Lee et al. ; Bossier v. Herwig, 112 La.539.
Cooper v. Edwards 92 So. 721 La. 1922
Hake v. Lee & Beall, , 31 South.
Parish v. Machen 80 So. 887 La. 1919
Williams v. Harrell 60 So. 699 La. 1913
Hake v. Lee & Beall, , 31 South.
Miller v. Vivian Oil Co. 60 So. 236 La. 1912
In this state, the question has been presented in connection with tax sales, and the rule stated has been sustained, or referred to with approval, in the following cases, viz.: Hake v. Lee & Beall, , 31 South.
Gulf Refining Co. v. Jeems Bayou Hunting & Fishing Club 57 So. 322 La. 1912
Hake v. Lee & Beall, , 31 South.
Duson v. Roos 49 So. 590 La. 1909
Harris v. Natalbany Lumber Co. 44 So. 806 La. 1907
In the case of Hake v. Lee & Beall, , 31 South.
Thompson v. Hebel 4 Teiss. 289 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1907
In Hake vs. Lee & Beall , the general rule was announced and applied in that case, but it appears that both co-owners acquired the property at the same time and by the same instrument from the then owners, Hake & Coach.
Alexander v. Light 36 So. 806 La. 1904
In Hake v. Lee & Beall, , 31 South.
Bossier v. Herwig 36 So. 557 La. 1904