Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sadler, 26 So. 390.

23 citing documents.

Succession of Sampognaro 890 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
He differs on the one hand from a mere usurper of an office who undertakes to act as an officer without color or right, and on the other from an officer de jure who is, in all respects, legally appointed and qualified to exercise the office.” , 26 So.
State ex rel. D.P.B. 817 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Love v. Baden 478 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
1397 , (1899); State v. Lewis, 22 La.Ann.
Duplechain v. Turner 444 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
1397 , (1899); State v. LeJeune, 116 La.
City of Baton Rouge v. Cooley 418 So. 2d 1321 La. 1982
1397 , (1899); State v. Schuermann, 146 La.
Michell v. Louisiana State Board of Optometry Exam. 146 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
1397 , ; State v. Schuermann, 146 La.
Feinblum v. Louisiana State Board of Optom. Exam. 97 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
1397 , ; State v. Schuermann, 146 La.
Wilson v. Lee 199 So. 117 La. 1940
State v. Sanderson 124 So. 143 La. 1929
State Ex Rel. Floyd v. Hodges 115 So. 747 La. 1928
State v. Moore 115 So. 445 La. 1928
[Italics ours.]” , 26 So.
Shields v. Town of Leesville 6 La. App. 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Ann. 930 , State vs. Sadler, , 26 South.
State v. Robertson 110 So. 888 La. 1926
That is the only test, one which involves a question of fact.” , 26 So.
Williams v. Police Jury of Concordia Parish 107 So. 126 La. 1926
State v. Bagwell 98 So. 549 La. 1923
State v. Smith 96 So. 127 La. 1923
State v. Hopkins 95 So. 221 La. 1922
State ex rel. Sellers v. Fifth Jefferson Drainage Dist. 92 So. 592 La. 1922
State v. Joseph 78 So. 663 La. 1918
On the other hand, the jurisprudence is uniform to the effect that the position of jury commissioner is a state “office,” , 1 is uniform to the effect that the acceptance of any other state office vacates that of jury commissioner, and vice versa, that the acceptance of the office or jury commissioner vacates any other state office.
State v. Lawson 66 So. 769 La. 1914
The ruling of the district judge, that a collateral attack cannot be made upon the title of a clerk of court to his office, , 26 South.
State ex rel. Davis v. Police Jury of Webster Parish 45 So. 47 La. 1907
The following decisions relate to the binding effect of acts by de facto officers: , 26 South.
State v. Daniels 38 So. 894 La. 1905
State v. Bollero 36 So. 754 La. 1904