Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Raziano v. Trauth, 131 So. 212.

32 citing documents.

Gleason v. Posey 229 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
650 , ), and in order to avoid being held liable, the driver of the following car must point to most unusual circumstances.” In the Vander v. New York Fire case the Third Circuit ably described any duty owed by the lead car to the following vehicle as follows: “The driver of the lead vehicle owes no duty of the following dr
PIGGLY-WIGGLY OP. WRHSE. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 174 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
650 , (1930); Sexton v. Stiles, 15 La.App.
Lewis v. Quebedeaux 134 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
650 , , wherein it was said: "But, assuming that the light and fog did affect his view, he would be required to exercise a degree of caution commensurate with the increased danger these circumstances involved."
Ervin v. Burns 126 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
650 , ; and O’Rourke v. McConaughey, La.App., 157 So.
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Cavalier 97 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
650 , ), and in order to avoid being held liable, the driver of the following car must point to most unusual circumstances.
Pardue v. Norred 95 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
650 , ; Waters v. Meriwether Transfer Company, Inc., 1931, 18 La.App.
Burger v. T. Smith & Son, Inc. 93 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
650 , ; O’Rourke v. McConaughey, 1934, La.App., 157 So.
Schneller v. Handy 93 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
650 , ; O’Rourke v. McConaughey, La.
Accounts Supervision Company v. Atley 89 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
The De Latour case further stated, : "The burden of proof is upon the creditor, who claims that his duly scheduled debt is excepted from the operation of the discharge in bankruptcy because of fraud."
Price-Dunham-Fenet Brick Manufacturing Co. v. Reeves 85 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1956
650 , ; and O’Rourke v. McConaughey, La.App., 157 So.
Dixie Highway Express v. CC Galbraith & Son 61 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Radovich v. Stipelcovich 32 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1947
650 , ; Sexton v. Stiles, 15 La.App.
Hemel v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. 31 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
App. 650 , ; Sexton v. Stiles, 15 La.
Thiaville v. Toups 25 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
App. 650 , ; and O'Rourke v. McConaughey, La.
Boland M. M. Co. v. Highway Ins. Underwriters 22 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
App. 650 , , we applied this doctrine and permitted recovery by the owner of a *Page 311 vehicle who had left it standing on a city street without lights, and which vehicle was run into by another vehicle.
Inman v. Silver Fleet of Memphis 175 So. 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
650 , ; Parlongue v. Leon, 6 La.App.
Butler v. Mississippi Foundation Co. 175 So. 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
650 , ; Kelly v. Schmidt & Zeigler, 142 La.
Peterson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 174 So. 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Klotz v. Tru-Fruit Distributors 173 So. 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
650 , ; Hutchinson v. T. L. James & Co. (La.App.)
Arbo v. Schulze 173 So. 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
650 , ; King v. Emmons, 10 La.App.
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Saia 173 So. 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
650 , ; Sexton v. Stiles, 15 La.App.
Maggio v. M. F. Bradford Motor Express, Inc. 171 So. 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Leitz v. Rosenthal 166 So. 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Hutchinson v. T. L. James & Co. 160 So. 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
App. 650 , , we said, in speaking of a similar situation, that “ * * * if the fog affected his [Trauth’s] vision, he should not have maintained a speed of 20 miles an hour knowing that he was driving on a very narrow thoroughfare.” In O’Rourke v. McConaughey, 157 So.
O'Rourke v. McConaughey. 157 So. 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
App. 650 , , this court said: *604 “It is admitted that plaintiff was guilty of negligence.
Provosty v. Christy 152 So. 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Gilly v. Harris 152 So. 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Bordelon v. T. L. James & Co. 148 So. 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
App. 650 , ; Baden v. Globe Indemnity Company (La.
Wyble v. Putfork 141 So. 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
App. 650 , ; Southall v. Smith, 151 La.
Safety Tire Service, Inc. v. Murov 140 So. 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
App. 650 , ; Kern v. Knight et al., 13 La.
Tassin v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 139 So. 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
App. 050 , , to the effect that: “Reasonable care requires in many cases that the driver of a motor vehicle drive at a slower speed at night than during the day.
Quatray v. Wicker 134 So. 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
App. 650 , ; Pepper v. Walsworth, 6 La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by