DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Muller v. Hoth, 105 La. 246.

14 citing documents.

  • Smith v. Alliance Compressors 922 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Adrinner Smith v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Oswalt v. STATE, DOTD 640 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Thibodeaux v. Burton 538 So. 2d 1001 La. 1989
  • Young v. Warner 283 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (4th La.App.1963); Weinberger Sales Company, (Orl.App.1941); , 29 So.
  • Weinberger Sales Co. v. Truett 2 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
  • Deimel v. Etheridge 198 So. 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
  • Succession of Robinson 172 So. 429 La. 1936
    record of a suit discloses enough to satisfy the court that the whole story of the case is not told, that essential facts have not been given in evidence and important documents have been omitted, and that substantial justice cannot be done between the parties in the state of the record as filed here, the court will, in its discretion, in the interest of justice, remand the case.’ , 29 So.
  • Burthe v. Lee 152 So. 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    record of a suit discloses enough to satisfy the court that the whole story of the ease is not told, that essential facts have not been given in evidence and important documents have been omitted, and that substantial justice cannot be done between the parties in the state of the record as filed here, the court will, in its discretion, in the interest of justice, remand the case.’ , 29 So.
  • Goldsmith v. Unity Industrial Life Insurance 128 So. 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    861 ; Muller vs. Hoth, , 29 So.
  • Handy v. N. O. Public Service, Inc. 127 So. 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    No error or arbitrariness in the rulings of the judge is disclosed in the record.” See, also, Muller vs. Hoth, , 29 So.
  • Goode-Cage Drug Co. v. National Cigar Store 1 La. App. 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    Muller vs. Hoth, , 29 South.
  • Nessans v. Colomes 57 So. 1010 La. 1912
    ecord of a suit discloses enough to satisfy the court that the whole story of the case is not told, that essential facts have not been given in evidence and important documents have been omitted, and that substantial justice cannot be done between the parties in the state of the record -as filed here, the court will, in its discretion, in the interest of justice, remand the case.” , 29 South.
  • Muller v. Hoth 34 So. 162 La. 1902