Sundmaker v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R. R.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 23, 1931 133 So. 399
Sundmaker v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R. R., 106 La. 111 (1901).
Cited by
- Peperone v. Lee 160 So. 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1935
- Brown v. Wade 145 So. 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Bosarge v. Spiess Co. 145 So. 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Jacoby v. Gallaher 126 So. 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- Smith v. City of Baton Rouge 119 So. 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
- Sherwood v. American Ry. Express Co. 103 So. 436 La. 1925
- Hebert v. Baton Rouge Electric Co. 91 So. 406 La. 1922
- Vincent v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co. 74 So. 541 La. 1917
- Roby v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 58 So. 701 La. 1912
- Underwood v. Gulf Refining Co. 55 So. 641 La. 1911
- Burvant v. Wolfe 52 So. 1025 La. 1910
- Bourg v. Brownell-Drews Lumber Co. 45 So. 972 La. 1908
Opinion text
On Application for Rehearing. Per Curiam. A further consideration of the case, on the application for rehearing filed, has led to the conclusion that a further reduction in the judgment should be made and that its amount should be fixed at four thousand dollars instead of five thousand dollars. Accordingly, it is ordered that the decree heretofore entered be vacated, and it is now adjudged and decreed that the judgment, appealed from be amended by.reducing the same from ten thousand dollars to four thousand dollars, with legal interest from April 30,1900, and, as thus amended, the same be affirmed —costs of appeal to be borne by plaintiff and appellee; those of the lower court by defendant and appellant. Rehearing refúsed. Monroe, J. I dissent from the refusal of the court to grant a rehearing.