Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sandoz v. Veazie, 106 La. 202.

30 citing documents.

SOUTHERN GEN. AGENCY v. Safeway Ins. Co. 769 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Terro v. Chamblee 663 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Hunt v. Chapman 458 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Jones v. Soileau 448 So. 2d 1268 La. 1984
Jones v. Soileau 435 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hill v. Smith 399 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coleman v. Kroger Co. 371 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Lees v. Smith 363 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Johnson v. Pearce, supra ; , 30 So.
Johnson v. Pearce 313 So. 2d 812 La. 1975
Roche v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 303 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Robinson v. Goudchaux's 307 So. 2d 287 La. 1975
There is, moreover, a , 30 So.
Robinson v. Goudchaux's 294 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Motichek v. Clovis-Hendry, Inc. 280 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Young v. Young 251 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
as communicated to his counsel all the facts bearing on the case of which he has knowledge, or could have ascertained by reasonable diligence and inquiry, and has acted upon the advice received honestly and in good faith, the absence of malice is established, the want of probable cause is negatived, and the action for malicious prosecution will not lie”, , 30 So.
Blanchard v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 197 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
Glynn v. Le Normand 80 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
se of which he has knowledge, or could have ascertained by reasonable diligence and inquiry, and has acted upon the advice received honestly and in good faith, the absence of malice is established, the want of probable cause is negatived, and the action for malicious prosecution will not lie;” and a fortiori is this the case where the counsel consulted is the public prosecutor.’ , 30 So.
O'Rourke v. O'Rourke 69 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1954
Dauphine v. Herbert 37 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1948
"Probable cause does not depend upon the actual state of the case in point of fact, 'but upon the honest and reasonable belief of the party prosecuting', , 30 So.
Eumont v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. 36 So. 2d 30 La. 1948
879 .” Probable cause does not depend upon the actual state of the case in point of fact, “but upon the honest and reasonable belief of the party prosecuting”, , 30 So.
Eusant v. Unity Industrial Life Ins., Etc., Ass'n 196 So. 554 La. 1940
se of which he has knowledge, or could have ascertained by reasonable diligence and inquiry, and has acted upon the advice received honestly and in good faith, the absence of malice is established, the want of probable cause is negatived, and the action for malicious prosecution will not lie;’ and a fortiori is this the case where the counsel consulted is the public prosecutor.” , 30 So.
Verret v. Mahler 154 So. 441 La. 1934
■“Though the fact may be that he was laboring under an erroneous belief, the belief and conviction was nevertheless ‘bona fide,’ and founded upon information and advice which he regarded as competent.” , 30 So.
Urbanek v. Moore 154 So. 4 La. 1934
Graham v. Interstate Electric Co. 127 So. 879 La. 1930
Strong v. American Ry. Express Co. 111 So. 669 La. 1927
Mullen v. Gause 109 So. 31 La. 1926
Dedebant v. Maestri 64 So. 142 La. 1913
[1] “In so far as concerns the charge before the criminal district court, which was by information filed by the district attorney, in my opinion, no damages should be allowed, , 30 South.
Peterman v. Poitevant & Favre Lumber Co. 55 So. 25 La. 1911
“Probable cause does not depend upon the actual state of the case, in point of fact, but upon the honest and reasonable belief of the party prosecuting.” , 30 South.
Gresham v. Collier 54 So. 590 La. 1911
Hammar v. Atkins 50 So. 787 La. 1909
Covington v. Roberson 35 So. 586 La. 1903