Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tensas Delta Land Co. v. Sholars, 105 La. 357.
-
Giordano v. Riverbend Rentals Co.
674 So. 2d 444
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
415, 416 (La.1924) ( , 29 So.
-
Hubbs v. Canova
392 So. 2d 486
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
415 ; [ Tensas Delta] , 29 So.
- Ward v. South Coast Corporation 3 So. 2d 689 La. 1941
- Pill v. Morgan 172 So. 409 La. 1936
-
Federal Land Bank v. Scallan
154 So. 632
La. 1934
328 , Tensas *643 , 29 So.
- Cook v. Morgan 142 So. 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Lee v. Givens 134 So. 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
-
Mattern v. Parqutt
123 So. 189
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
“Notice is sacramental.” Tensas vs. Sholars, , 29 So.
-
Third District Land Co. v. Smith
4 La. App. 567
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
sheriff shall either deliver to ehch tax payer, in person, or shall leave at his residence or place of business in the Parish of Orleans one of said notices and a return, or statement in writing of the mode of such service shall be made by the officer serving the same and be filed in the office of the tax collector or sheriff and shall be received by the courts as prima facie evidence of notice.” .
- Recker v. Dupuy 108 So. 782 La. 1926
-
Jones v. Curran
101 So. 415
La. 1924
In T. D. Land Co. v. C. & M. D. Sholars, , 29 South.
-
Nebraska-Tensas Co. v. Moritz
102 So. 195
La. 1924
139 , there was no proof as to whether tbe tax collector at tbe sale offered the least quantity of land before proceeding to offer the whole, and tbe tax deed was silent as to such fact, and tbe court said: “This court, , 29 South.
-
Gele v. Cotonio
3 Teiss. 165
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1906
*168 The defendant relies on the absence of these records as sufficient to rebut the presumption of notice, and cites in support of his theory the case of Land Co. vs. Sholars, .
- Pitre v. Schleslinger 34 So. 425 La. 1903