Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Newman v. Eldridge, 107 La. 315.
- Taylor v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 579 So. 2d 443 La. 1991
- Istre v. Diamond M. Drilling Company 226 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
- Apex Sales Company v. Abraham 201 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
- Superior Merchandise Corporation v. Oser 8 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Elfer v. Mintz 7 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Klotz v. Tru-Fruit Distributors 173 So. 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
-
Donohoe Oil & Gas Co. v. MacK-jourden Co.
144 So. 169
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
898, 899 , the court said: “Under the civil law, which prevails in' this state, a partnership is a legal entity entirely separate and distinct from the persons who compose it, and may have its own creditors and debtors to the same extent as' the individual partners.” Citing, , 31 So.
- Terzia v. the Grand Leader 145 So. 363 La. 1932
- Siren v. Montague 142 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Snyder v. Davison 134 So. 89 La. 1931
- Roper v. Monroe Grocer Co. 129 So. 811 La. 1930
-
Leary v. Lyons Lumber Co.
6 La. App. 346
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Newman vs. Eldridge, , 31 South.
-
Young v. Bowie
3 La. App. 8
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
In the case of Newman vs. Eldridge, , 31 South.
- E. B. Hayes Machinery Co. v. Eastham 84 So. 898 La. 1920
-
Stothart v. William T. Hardie & Co.
34 So. 740
La. 1903
4 : “The partnership was a distinct personality from the individuals who compose it.” Quite recently, this court said: “The firm was a legal entity, separate and distinct from its members; and the two firms, though one had grown out of the other, and had in its composition two members, or ex-members, of the other, were entirely distinct and separate legal entities or persons.” , 31 South.