Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lampkin v. McCormick, 105 La. 418.

15 citing documents.

Reeves v. Louisiana and Arkansas Railway Company 282 So. 2d 503 La. 1973
McFarland v. Illinois Central Railroad Company 122 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
James v. Thompson 35 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Robinson v. Miller 177 So. 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
o your petitioners, for the use and benefit of their said child, for the damages their said child has sustained.” On behalf of the defendant Schiff-ler, the argument is made that because plaintiffs’ son was riding on the running hoard of the Ford truck in violation of rule 22 of section 3 of Act No. 21 of 1932, he was guilty of negligence which precludes his recovery; , 29 So.
Sizemore v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co. 164 So. 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
207 ; Lampkin v. McCormick, Receiver, , 29 So.
Natal v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co. 137 So. 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1931
Seelhorst v. PontcharTrain R. R. 123 So. 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
As was said in Lampkin vs. McCormick, , 29 So.
Southern v. City of New Orleans 120 So. 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
146 , 50 L. R. A. (N. S.) 688, it was held: “Where, according to a general custom, newsboys are permitted to ride the street railway cars to sell and deliver papers, a boy is not a trespasser while on a car selling a paper unless the right to remain on the car has been terminated by reasonable notice.” See also Lampkin vs. McCormick, , 29 So.
Murphy v. N. O. Public Service 7 La. App. 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Lampkin vs. McCormick, (427), 29 South.
Draiss v. Payne 104 So. 487 La. 1925
The results should have been put to the test by actual trial made at the time.” , 29 So.
Gibbons v. N. O. Terminal Co. 1 La. App. 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Lampkin vs. McCormick, -427, 29 South.
Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co. 90 So. 512 La. 1922
Blackburn v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. 80 So. 708 La. 1919
569 (differentiated); , 29 South.
Platt v. Vicksburg, S. & Pacific Ry. Co. 64 So. 282 La. 1914
207 ; Lampkin Case, , 29 South.
Lewis v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co. 38 So. 92 La. 1905
207 ; Lamkin v. McCormick, Receiver, , 29 South.