Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stern v. Lanng, 106 La. 738.
-
Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center
636 So. 2d 211
La. 1994
4th Cir.1964) (breach of express agreement); , 31 So.
- Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 360 So. 2d 1331 La. 1978
- Brock v. Gunter 292 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
- Bryant v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. 272 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
- Johnson v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company 219 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
- Folse v. Anderson 202 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Stern v. Boyce 200 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Powell v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 185 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
- Osburn v. Saltz 169 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Norton v. Argonaut Insurance Company 144 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
- Favalora v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 144 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
- Fairley v. Douglas 76 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
- Wells v. McGehee 39 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
-
Freche v. Mary
16 So. 2d 213
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
786, 787 , this Court said: "The degree of care which the law exacts of physicians and dentists is that usually exercised by practitioners in good standing", , 31 So.
-
Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
172 So. 812
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
It suffices under the terms of the act that they should have been called to testify only to an opinion, or to the result of scientific or professional examination.” See, also, , 31 So.
- Mournet v. Sumner 139 So. 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
-
Comeaux v. Miles
118 So. 786
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Stern vs. Laurg, , 31 So.
-
Verdier v. Goreau
6 Pelt. 202
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1922
his feet-A Doctor of large experience says that the defendant liad some of the symptoms of the disease for which the plaintiff treated hlnyand that if the defendant had been thus aflicted the treatment administered to him would have been the proper one.The error of the plaintiff was therefore in his diagnosis.A physician is responsible -only for evident negligence or want of skill.Stern vs Lanng -He 1b not liable because he has Committed an error,but because he haB been guilty of a fault 39 Dall