No. 13-KA-760
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. B.D.
State ex rel. B.D., 140 So. 3d 308 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.F. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of T.W.-d. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of R.B. Vs. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of N.S. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
- In re State 240 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
- State ex rel. D.M. 247 So. 3d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- State in the Interest of T. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- State ex rel. T. J. 219 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State ex rel. C.L. 180 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State ex rel. T.W. 175 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State ex rel. H.N. 171 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Opinion text
JOHNSON, J., Concurs with Reasons. hi concur with the result reached by the majority; specifically, I agree that there was no double jeopardy violation in this case. I disagree with the majority’s statement that double jeopardy never attached because of the nature of the two separate proceedings. Rather, I agree only with the majority’s analysis insofar as they find that Defendant was not punished twice for the same offense because Defendant’s contempt adjudication was not based on any evidence relating to the unauthorized use of a motor vehicle for which he was subsequently adjudicated delinquent.