Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Buckley v. Dumond, 156 So. 784.

16 citing documents.

  • McCoy v. Toms 384 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Harper v. Willis 383 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Liner v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co. 319 So. 2d 766 La. 1975
  • Humble v. Dewey 215 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
  • Champagne v. La-Terre Co. 201 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    A similar definition to “by such depth as the confirmation calls for” was presented in the case of Buckley v. Dumond, La.App., , which opinion included the companion case of Buckley v. Theriot, La.App., 156 So.
  • Harry Bourg Corp. v. Parfait 199 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    797 (1892), and there must be a positive intention to take and commence possession as owner, (La.App.
  • Broussard v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co. 164 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Broussard v. Wisner 164 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Hamilton v. Bowie Lumber Co. 147 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    In Buckley v. Dumond, La.App., the Court held that the trapping of swamp lands under contract with the owner, constituted possession of said lands by the owner and showed the “intention on the part of the owner to thereby take and commence the real, actual possession of the land.” The petitioners on appeal have raised the question of a “tax subroga
  • Wischer v. Madison Realty Co. 146 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    149 , ; Buckley v. Dumond, La.App., .
  • Champagne v. Lepine 130 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    (Same v. Theriot), La.App., , 789.
  • Dixon v. Zemurray 82 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    1934, ; Bruning v. City of New Orleans, 1927, 165 La.
  • Bossier Enterprises, Inc. v. Carbone 66 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    151 ; Buckley v. Dumond, La.App.1934, ; Bruning v. City of New Orleans, 1927, 165 La.
  • Acosta v. Nunez 5 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    508 ; Buckley v. Dumond (Buckley v. Theriot), La.App., ; Buckley v. Theriot, La.App., 156 So.
  • Buckley v. Thibodeaux 163 So. 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
  • Buckley v. Theriot 156 So. 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    In this case, for the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases, , Nos. 10525 and 10528 on the docket of the district court, parish of Terrebonne, this day decided, the judgment rendered in the case of Charles W. Buckley v. John Theriot, No. 10528 on the docket of said court, is affirmed.