Lagarde v. Liberty Shop, Ltd.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 15, 1980 393 So. 2d 371; La. Ct. App. 2d Cir., May 1, 1979 371 So. 2d 305
Lagarde v. Liberty Shop, Ltd., 139 So. 67 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932).
Cited by
- Chaney v. Hutches 192 So. 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
- Toye v. Richmond. 157 So. 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Opinion text
WESTERFIELD, J. This case results from an intersectional collision between a motortruck and an automobile. The trial court, in dismissing the main and reconventional demands, evidently concluded that both drivers were at fault, and so it seems to us. Both drivers failed to stop or slacken their speed before entering the intersection, and neither saw the other until *68 just before tbe impact. Both were guilty of negligence in failing to keep a proper lookout and in failing to stop, or slow down. The fact that the comer where the accident occurred, Chestnut and Josephine streets, is what is known as a “blind crossing,” where it is difficult for drivers approaching the intersection at right angles to see each other, necessitates the exercise of care commensurate with the danger involved. For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.