No. 14,506 Precedential Reversed. Processed

Martin Davie & Co. v. Carville

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed March 16, 1903 · 34 So. 807

Cited by

LOUISIANA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Pernici 372 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Armato v. Ross 177 So. 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Armato v. Ross 170 So. 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Haight v. Johnson 60 So. 248 La. 1912

Opinion text

On Application for a Rehearing. PER CURIAM. We see no reason for changing the decree heretofore rendered in this case. It left open to the plaintiffs as *878 widely as possible all remedies which could be hereafter resorted to, having in view specially the giving them an opportunity of proving in another action the correctness of their allegation that the articles sold to defendant’s husband for the price of which they were suing herein, and on which they claimed a vendor’s privilege, were still in existence at the husband’s death, and were taken possession of and sold by his widow, the defendant. The rehearing applied for is refused. BLANCHARD, J., dissents.