Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. De Hart, 33 So. 605.

26 citing documents.

State v. Casaday 162 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Dehart [De Hart ], , 33 So.
State of Louisiana v. Billy Frank Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Jackson 866 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Baker 535 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Trigueros 485 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Acliese 403 So. 2d 665 La. 1981
Davenport v. Hardy 349 So. 2d 858 La. 1977
State v. Birabent 305 So. 2d 448 La. 1974
State v. Morgan 296 So. 2d 286 La. 1974
State v. Deutch 161 So. 2d 730 La. 1964
An examination of the jurisprudence and other statutory law, which we are permitted to consider ( , 33 So.
State v. Lawrence 60 So. 2d 464 La. 1952
Barnett v. Sewerage & Water Board 51 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
State v. Ferrand 27 So. 2d 174 La. 1946
State v. Pete 20 So. 2d 368 La. 1944
e it is entirely a creature of the Louisiana Legislature, it cannot be considered as coming within the constitutional limitations of Section 18 of Article III, since this court has held “that the words ‘any system or code of laws,’ as used in the article, means system or codes of law other than our own— systems of law, codes of law in vogue in other countries and jurisdictions.” , 33 So.
State v. Kavanaugh 13 So. 2d 366 La. 1943
State v. Whitlock 192 So. 697 La. 1939
Charity Hospital v. Axford 131 So. 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
124 U. S. 656 ; 111 U. S. 1 ; 105 U. S. 278 ; 22 W. 351 ; 118 P. R. 549 ; 97 F. R. 435; 88 F. R. 449; 54 F. R. 456; , 53 So.
Campagna v. City of Baton Rouge 116 So. 403 La. 1928
In this connection, , at page 575, 33 So.
State v. Thrift Oil & Gas Co. 110 So. 188 La. 1926
576 , , in construing article 31 of the Constitution of 1879, similar in its provisions to section 18 of article 3 of the present Constitution, this court said: "We are inclined to think that the words `any system or code of laws,' as used in the article, means systems or codes of law other than our own — systems of l
State v. McCollough 90 So. 404 La. 1922
Town of Ruston v. Dewey 76 So. 719 La. 1917
These two words sometimes convey the same meaning, but as applied in the quoted provisions of law, we incline to the opinion that the word “subject” means “subject-matter,” while “object” , 33 South.
Ayers Asphalt & Paving Co. v. Hill 3 Teiss. 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1906
Reports p. 156-158: “If all the parts of a statute have a natural connection and reasonably relate, directly or indirectly, to one general and legitimate subject of legislation the act is not open to the objection of plurality, no matter how extensive or minutely it deals with the details looking to the accomplishment of the main legislative purpose.” 124 U. S. 656 ; 111 U. S. 1 ; 105 U. S. 278 ; ; 106 La.
State v. Freddy 41 So. 436 La. 1906
State v. Spurling 40 So. 167 La. 1906
City of New Orleans v. Cotonio 1 Teiss. 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1904
124 U. S. 656 ; 111 U. S. 1 ; 105 U. S. 278 ; 22 W. 351 ; 118 F. R. 549; 97 F. R. 435; 88 F. R. 449; 54 F. R. 456; ; 106 La.
State v. Hauser 36 So. 396 La. 1904