Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Choppin v. Dauphin, 36 So. 287.

19 citing documents.

Gennuso v. State 339 So. 2d 335 La. 1976
Pond v. Campbell 207 So. 2d 535 La. 1968
Monk v. Monk 144 So. 2d 384 La. 1962
Aegis Insurance Co. v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co. 99 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Construing that article, this court said, in the case of -143, 36 So.
State ex rel. Stansberry v. Stansberry 83 So. 2d 890 La. 1955
Sustendal v. Weber 76 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Succession of Pujol v. Manning 59 So. 2d 456 La. 1952
Lobell ex rel. Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Neal 48 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Adkins' Heirs v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth, Ltd. 24 So. 2d 246 La. 1945
Meyer v. Rein 18 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Mayer v. Ford 12 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Construing that article, this court said, in the case of -143, 36 So.
Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 191 So. 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Hope v. Madison 188 So. 711 La. 1939
The rule which prevails in our practice is concisely stated as follows, in , 36 So.
Hogh v. Baloga 180 So. 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Sistrunk v. Audubon Park Natatorium, Inc. 164 So. 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Succession of Smith 162 So. 21 La. 1935
In , at page 142, 36 So.
Baden v. Globe Indemnity Co. 145 So. 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Kinder v. Scharff 55 So. 769 La. 1911
Poirier v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co. 54 So. 292 La. 1911
“from the date knowledge of such damage is received by the owners of the land.” The language of this act is not different in its import from that of article 613, Code Prae., relating to the action in nullity of judgment for fraud, which is that the suit must be brought “within the year the fraud has been discovered.” Construing that article, this court said, in the case of -143, 36 South.