Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hauser, 36 So. 396.
-
State v. Ash
242 So. 2d 535
La. 1970
The following cases were cited by the Court: “ , 36 So.
- State v. Hudson 221 So. 2d 484 La. 1969
-
State v. Richard
89 So. 2d 367
La. 1956
313, ; State v. Ruffin, 117 La.
- State v. Ware 84 So. 2d 56 La. 1955
- State v. Dartez 62 So. 2d 83 La. 1952
-
State v. Brown
36 So. 2d 624
La. 1948
xceptions for the reason that they were not filed by him until two months and nine days after he had granted the defendant a suspensive appeal, despite the fact that the bills were timely filed and tendered to him for action and he failed to reserve to himself the right to prepare the per curiams at the time he granted the appeal, , 36 So.
- State v. Gustopolis 125 So. 862 La. 1930
- State v. Pitre 125 So. 617 La. 1929
- State v. Daspit 118 So. 690 La. 1928
- State v. Scruggs 116 So. 206 La. 1928
- State v. Jackson 111 So. 486 La. 1927
- State v. Barrett 68 So. 945 La. 1915
- State v. Wood 67 So. 542 La. 1915
-
State v. Schofield
67 So. 557
La. 1915
The doctrine of that case militates in no way against that of the two foregoing cases, or against that of the following: , 36 South.
- State v. Labry 50 So. 700 La. 1909
- State v. Behler 50 So. 483 La. 1909
- State v. Moore 44 So. 299 La. 1907
-
State v. Ruffin
41 So. 647
La. 1906
The judge refused to sign the bills of defendant on the ground that they were not presented to him until after the appeal had been lodged in this court, when, , 36 South.
- State v. Alexander 37 So. 711 La. 1904
- State v. Foley 36 So. 940 La. 1904