Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Potts v. Shreveport Belt Ry. Co., 34 So. 103.

22 citing documents.

Pillow v. Entergy Corp. 828 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Levi v. SW La. Elec. Membership Co-Op. 542 So. 2d 1081 La. 1989
Barrois v. Service Drayage Company 250 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Thomas v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 128 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Stansbury v. Mayor and Councilmen of Morgan City 84 So. 2d 445 La. 1955
Calton v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 56 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
Coulon v. City of Alexandria 44 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Short v. Central Louisiana Electric Co. 36 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Scott v. Claiborne Electric Cooperative 13 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Layne v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 161 So. 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Freibert v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 159 So. 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
348 , the court said: “It was the duty of the company, independent of any statutory regulation, to see that their lines were safe for those who by their occupation were brought in close proximity to them.” , 34 So.
Younse v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Co. 159 So. 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Ledet v. Lockport Power & Light Co. 132 So. 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
A superior is presumed to know, and in law knows, that which it is his duty to know, namely, whatever may endanger the person and life of his employee in the discharge of his duties.” Plaintiffs’ son was not defendant’s employee, , 34 So.
Horrell v. Gulf & Valley Cotton Oil Co. 131 So. 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Johnson v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. 5 La. App. 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In Potts vs. Rrd., , 34 So.
Haight v. New Orleans Public Service Inc. 2 La. App. 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Babin v. Sewerage & Water Board 2 La. App. 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
51 , affirmed in Potts vs. Shreveport, , 34 South.
Borell v. Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone Co. 63 So. 247 La. 1913
Moren v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. 52 So. 106 La. 1910
Roff v. Summit Lumber Co. 44 So. 302 La. 1907
Whitworth v. Shreveport Belt Ry. Co. 36 So. 414 La. 1904
This case is the sequel of that of Mrs. Birdie Potts v. Shreveport Belt Railway Co., reported in , 34 South.
Hebert v. Lake Charles Ice, Light & Waterworks Co. 35 So. 731 La. 1903
This is in direct opposition to expert testimony in the record, , 34 South.