Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lewis v. Holmes, 34 So. 66.

25 citing documents.

Young v. Ford Motor Co., Inc. 595 So. 2d 1123 La. 1992
Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 572 So. 2d 571 La. 1991
Albin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 498 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
849 ; and in some instances from breach of contract, , 34 So.
Meador v. Toyota of Jefferson, Inc. 332 So. 2d 433 La. 1976
Levy v. Duclaux 324 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
849 ; and in some instances from breach of contract, , 34 So.
Caswell v. Reserve National Insurance Company 272 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Appellee relies upon two cases in support of his contention that Article 1934 (3) entitles him to this award for general damages, Mitchell v. Shreveport Laundries, Inc., La.App., , , 34 So.
Nickens v. McGehee 184 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
849 ; and in some instances from breach of contract, , 34 So.
Holland v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. 135 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Plaintiffs next cite Lewis v. Holmes (1903) , 34 So.
Mitchell v. Shreveport Laundries 61 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
Mitchell v. Shreveport Laundries, Inc. 60 So. 2d 86 La. 1952
Melson v. Woodruff 23 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Vogel v. Saenger Theatres, Inc. 22 So. 2d 189 La. 1945
Angelloz v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. 199 So. 656 La. 1940
Humphreys v. Bennett Oil Corporation 197 So. 222 La. 1940
Civil Code, Articles 1934, 2315; , 34 So.
Jiles v. Venus Community Center Benev. Mut. Aid Ass'n 186 So. 342 La. 1939
Distinguished Rembert v. Fenner & Beane 175 So. 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Rigaud v. Garvey 8 La. App. 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
1035 , ; Marqueze & Co. vs. Fernandez & Co., 30 La.
Timberlake v. Cassidy 1 La. App. 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
3990; also Lewis vs. Holmes, , 34 South.
Williams v. Perloff 1 La. App. 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
1035 , ; Schoppel vs. Daly, 112 La.
Garner v. Burnstein 1 La. App. 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
In the case of Lewis vs. Holmes, , 34 So.
Cooper v. Blanck 39 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1923
Baker v. Western Union Tel. Co. 5 Pelt. 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1922
Johnson v. Levy 43 So. 46 La. 1907
Stewart v. Arkansas Southern R. 36 So. 676 La. 1904
Frankforester v. Clesi 1 Teiss. 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1904
As was said in Lewis vs Holmes , which was a case somewhat analagous to the instant cause: “When both the husband and wife are parties plaintiff to the suit, and the claim sued on belongs to one or the other, the defendant is without interest to urge that the claim belongs to one of the spouses in'particular, and that the suit should have been brou

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by