McClanahan v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co.
McClanahan v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co., 35 So. 902 (La. 1902).
Cited by
- Gregoire v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. 158 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Shipp v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. in Trusteeship 188 So. 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
- Pinckley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 165 So. 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
- Dowling v. Texas Pacific-Missouri Pacific Terminal R. 154 So. 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Loewenberg v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. 147 So. 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Buckley v. Featherstone Garage, Inc. 123 So. 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
- Gibson v. T. & P. Ry. Co. 121 So. 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
- Canal Steel Works, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 121 So. 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
- Johnson v. Boyle 5 La. App. 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
- Croft v. Southern Hardwood Lumber Co. 7 La. App. 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
- Parlongue v. Leon 6 La. App. 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
- Jones v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. 111 So. 62 La. 1926
Opinion text
On Rehearing. (Jan. 4, 1904.) PER CURIAM. The argument and the reconsideration which this case has received upon the rehearing have led to some modification of the views heretofore entertained or acquiesced in by different members of the court, without, however, bringing about any practical change in the result—a majority, consisting of the organ of the court upon the former hearing, the CHIEF JUSTICE, and Mr. Justice BREAUX, being still of opinion that the judgment in favor of the plaintiff should be affirmed; Mr. Justice MONROE, for the reasons assigned in the original opinion; and the CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice BREAUX, for reasons which will be hereafter assigned by them. It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decree heretofore entered be reinstated and made the final judgment and decree of the court. LAND, J., takes no part, See concurring opinions of NICHOLLS, C. J., 35 South. 907 , and BREAUX, J., Id. 908 , and dissenting opinion of PROVOSTY, J., Id.