Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Simmons, 34 So. 101.
-
McCreary Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Hemmans
802 So. 2d 807
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2 Cir.1978) As long as there is any doubt concerning whether a change of domicile has occurred “the presumption is that it has not been changed.” Succession of Simmons [ , 34 So.
- Succession of Lauricella 571 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- Trotter v. Trotter 503 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Succession of Thompson v. Harrington 502 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- Gowins v. Gowins 466 So. 2d 32 La. 1985
- Temple v. Jackson 376 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
- In Re Kennedy 357 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
- Mix v. Blanchard 318 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
- Charbonnet v. Hayes 318 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
-
Succession of McElwee
276 So. 2d 391
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
In Re Adoption of Rials, supra; , 34 So.
- Succession of Barger 217 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
- Baham v. Sutherland 197 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
- Harrison v. Commission Council of Bogalusa 169 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Blackburn v. Blackburn 168 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
-
Succession of Primeaux
159 So. 2d 725
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Foreman v. Jordan, La.App., : , 34 So.
- Foreman v. Jordan 131 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
- Graves v. Graves 122 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
-
Dealers Building Material Supply Co. v. Campbell
89 So. 2d 419
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Plaintiff appellant has correctly set forth a statement of the law on acquiring a domicile as stated in the , 34 So.
- In Re Adoption of Rials 56 So. 2d 844 La. 1951
- Clarke v. Patton 16 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1944
-
Rappeport v. Patten
3 So. 2d 909
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
With reference to the matter of proving a change of domicile, however, our Supreme Court observed in , 1097, 34 So.
- First Nat. Bank of Shreveport v. Pierson 146 So. 749 La. 1933
- Person v. Person 135 So. 225 La. 1931
- Umbarger v. Tower 131 So. 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- Le Blanc v. Loughridge 95 So. 419 La. 1923
- Texana Oil & Refining Co. v. Belchic 90 So. 522 La. 1922
- First Nat. Bank v. Hinton 49 So. 692 La. 1909
- Ballard v. Puleston 36 So. 951 La. 1904