DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., 34 So. 54.

17 citing documents.

  • Technisonic Research, Inc. v. Technical Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    605 (1929); Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., So.
  • Technisonic Research, Inc. v. Technical Industries, Inc. 856 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    605 (1929); Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 So.
  • Wilson v. MFA SEC. Service Co. 410 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    605 (1929); Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 So.
  • Roper v. Dailey 393 So. 2d 85 La. 1981
    605 (1929); Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 So.
  • Roper v. Dailey 379 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    1st Cir. 1941); Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 So.
  • Hood Motor Company, Inc. v. Lawrence 334 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    In Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 So.
  • Wilson v. King 79 So. 2d 877 La. 1955
    Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 So.
  • Sharp v. Sharp 78 So. 2d 491 La. 1955
    See Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 So.
  • Smith v. Crescent Chevrolet Co. 1 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
  • Weldon v. Gandy 195 So. 655 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1940
    In the case of Baham Bros. v. Stewart Bros. & Company, , 34 So.
  • Wunderlich v. Palmisano 177 So. 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1938
    [577], 582; Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 So.
  • Polk v. Saunders 133 So. 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    1000 , ; State v. Baum, 51 La.
  • Adler v. Board of Levee Com'rs 123 So. 605 La. 1929
    As said in Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 So.
  • Gamburg v. Ray 120 So. 480 La. 1929
    in time, certified copies of the petition and citation to his wife, Mrs. A. B. (A. B. being absent at the time from his residence), parol evidence is admissible to show affirmatively that A. B. had had but one residence, which was that where the service was made; that A. B. was a married man; that his wife was over 14 years of age; and that she resided with him.” Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 So.
  • Mercantile Adjustment Co. v. Powers 5 La. App. 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
    Ann. 582 ; Baham vs. Stewart Bros. & Co., , 34 South.
  • Rousseau v. Texas & Pacific 4 La. App. 691 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1926
    Litigants owe the duty of assisting in every legitimate way in the elucidation of the truth.” And in Baham vs. Stewart Bros., , 34 South.
  • Broussard v. Rosenblum 5 La. App. 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    Litigants owe the duty of assisting in every legitimate way in the elucidation of the truth.” And in the case of Baham vs. Stewart Bros. , 34 South.