Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carey v. Cagney, 33 So. 89.

32 citing documents.

Securities Mortg. Co., Inc. v. Triplett 374 So. 2d 1226 La. 1979
City of New Orleans v. Peterson 142 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Hodgeson v. McDaniel 96 So. 2d 481 La. 1957
Thurmon v. Hogg 72 So. 2d 500 La. 1954
Prampin v. Southern Chemical Works 53 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Board of Commissioners, Etc. v. Sperling 12 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Morris v. Hankins 188 So. 155 La. 1939
Morris v. Hankins 185 So. 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Calcasieu Inv. Co. v. Corbello's Heirs 175 So. 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Carey et al. v. Cagney *104 et al., , 33 So.
Mire v. La Salle Realty Co. 146 So. 326 La. 1933
Federico v. Nunez 139 So. 18 La. 1931
Hudson v. Whitworth 137 So. 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
In construing and applying this former provision of the Constitution of 1898, the Supreme Court, , 33 So.
Commercial Securities Co. v. Smith 126 So. 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Klumpp v. Fontenot 122 So. 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Carey vs. Cagney, , 33 So.
Levenberg v. Shanks 115 So. 641 La. 1928
Kivlen v. Horvath 113 So. 140 La. 1927
Blanchard v. Estate of Hy Garland 6 La. App. 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Carey vs. Cagney, , 33 South.
Marque v. Kolwe 5 La. App. 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
82 , ; 9 Ashley Co. vs. Bradford, 109 La.
Jackson v. Lamb 4 La. App. 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
415 ; Carey vs. Cogney, , 33 South.
Tensas Delta Land Co. v. Anders 103 So. 522 La. 1925
Charbonnet v. State Realty Co. 99 So. 865 La. 1923
Bradley v. City of New Orleans 95 So. 718 La. 1923
06, this court said that the constitutional prescription of three years for the curing of tax titles, except where the taxes had been paid, did not apply in two cases: (1) Where the tax debtor was allowed to remain in actual corporeal possession; and (2) where the state has continued to assess the property to the former owner and to receive from him the taxes so assessed — , 33 South.
Flanagan v. Land Development Co. of Louisiana, Ltd. 83 So. 39 La. 1919
Adsit v. Park 81 So. 430 La. 1919
Baronet v. Houssiere 78 So. 242 La. 1918
Xeter Realty, Ltd. v. Basler 74 So. 185 La. 1917
Baldwin Lumber Co. v. Dalferes 70 So. 493 La. 1915
Hirst v. Xeter Realty, Ltd. 70 So. 339 La. 1915
In re Sheehy 44 So. 315 La. 1907
We are of opinion that article 233 of the Constitution of 1898 has no application where the property remains in the actual or corporeal possession of the tax debtor; the purchaser at the tax sale making no effort to dispossess the original owner.” , 33 South.
Crillen v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 41 So. 645 La. 1906
It has been held that the law quoted is inapplicable' (1) where the owner and tax debtor was at the time of the tax sale the actual possessor by corporeal detention of the property sold and has been allowed so to remain ( , 33 South.
Terry v. Heisen 40 So. 461 La. 1906
sis for the prescription established by the Constitution, the language of the court being: “We hold that tax titles accompanied by actual possession or constructive possession, only, in cases where there is no actual possession by any one, are unassailable, save for the two causes mentioned, after the lapse of the time given the record owner to institute proceedings to annul.” , 33 South.
Koen v. Martin 34 So. 429 La. 1903