Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Maxey, 107 La. 799.

13 citing documents.

Butler v. Washington-Youree Hotel Co. 160 So. 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
22 C. J. 449, §§ 543, 545, 549; 1 H. D. 502; No. 9293, Ct. App. “ ‘A declaration to be a part of the res geste need not be coincident in time with the main fact proved, if the two are so closely connected with the declaration and can, in the ordinary course of affairs, be said to be a spontaneous explanation of the real cause.’ , 32 So.
State v. Heintz 140 So. 28 La. 1932
State v. Bradley 118 So. 116 La. 1928
Day v. Armour Fertilizer Works 8 La. App. 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
543-545-549; 1 H. D. 502; No. 9293 Ct. App. “A declaration to be a part of tbe res gestae need not be coincident in time with the main fact proved, if the two are so closely connected with the declaration and can, in the ordinary course of affairs, be said to be a spontaneous explanation of the real cause.” State vs. Maxey, , 32 So.
State v. Johnson 107 So. 309 La. 1926
206 , ; State v. Pastor, 35 So.
State v. Hemler 103 So. 257 La. 1925
State v. Hopkins 95 So. 221 La. 1922
State v. Bordelon 75 So. 429 La. 1917
State v. Glover 73 So. 843 La. 1917
State v. Folden 66 So. 223 La. 1914
State v. Lee 53 So. 559 La. 1910
State v. Thomas 53 So. 562 La. 1910
State v. Callian 33 So. 363 La. 1903