Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Le Bleu v. Savoie, 33 So. 729.

22 citing documents.

Succession of Mary Lou Thrasher La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
It makes no difference that the contract in the particular case ts a sale of real estate by notarial act.” So.
Mitchell v. Clark 448 So. 2d 681 La. 1984
Mitchell v. Clark 431 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Calvary Tabernacle v. Louisiana Central Bank 384 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
4th Cir. 1962); Baker v. Baker, supra; , 33 So.
Wright v. Wright 346 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Miles v. Miles 328 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
LeBoeuf v. Malbrough 188 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Little v. Haik 163 So. 2d 558 La. 1964
Baker v. Baker 26 So. 2d 132 La. 1946
Wig-more on Evidence, 3d Ed., Sections 2413 and 2446(2); , 33 So.
Matthews v. Spears 24 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Wooten v. Jones 8 So. 2d 46 La. 1942
Templet v. Babbitt 5 So. 2d 13 La. 1941
Scurto v. Le Blanc 184 So. 567 La. 1938
Jackson v. Dominick 166 So. 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
“The learned counsel for plaintiff argues that the allegation of fraud opens the door to the parol evidence; , 33 So.
Reid v. Phillips 148 So. 690 La. 1933
Hood v. Hood 128 So. 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Glover v. Abney 106 So. 735 La. 1925
Harris v. Crichton 104 So. 114 La. 1925
Sherman v. Nehlig 97 So. 270 La. 1923
95 , 57 L. R. A. 353; , 33 South.
Cuggy v. Zeller 61 So. 209 La. 1913
Barrow v. Grant's Estate 41 So. 220 La. 1906
The learned counsel for plaintiff argues •that the allegation of fraud opens the door •to the parol evidence; and he cites in support . , 33 South.
Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. Kokosky 37 So. 24 La. 1904