Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lawson v. Shreveport Waterworks Co., 35 So. 390.
-
Lerner Shops of Louisiana, Inc. v. Reeves
73 So. 2d 490
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
727, 766; Lawson v. [Shreveport] Waterworks Co., , 35 So.
-
Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres
30 So. 2d 211
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
25 , 69 A. 1124 , 21 L.R.A., N.S., 464; Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 47 R.I. 165 , 131 A. 194 ; , 35 So.
-
Hays v. Maison Blanche Co.
30 So. 2d 225
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
25 , 69 A. 1124 , 21 L.R.A., N.S., 464; Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 47 R.I. 165 , 131 A. 194 ; , 35 So.
- Martini v. Cowart 18 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
-
Greeves v. S. H. Kress Co.
198 So. 171
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
73, .” Farrow v. John R. Thompson Company, 18 La.App.
-
Battles v. Wellan
195 So. 663
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1940
25 , 69 A. 1124 , 21 L.R.A.,N.S., 464; Langley v. Woolworth Company, 47 R.I. 165 , 131 A. 194 ; , 35 So.
-
Bartell v. Serio
180 So. 460
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
25 , 69 A. 1124 , 21 L.R.A.,N.S., 464; Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 47 R.I. 165 , 131 A. 194 ; , 35 So.
-
Bell v. Feibleman & Co.
164 So. 273
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
464; Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 47 R.I. 165 , 131 A. 194 ; , 35 So.
-
Ransom v. Kreeger Store, Inc.
158 So. 600
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
25 , 69 A. 1124 , 21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 464; Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 47 R. I. 165, 131 A. 194 ; , 35 So.
-
Huber v. American Drug Stores
140 So. 120
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
25 , 69 A. 1124 , 21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 464; Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 47 R. I. 165, 131 A. 194 ; , 35 So.
-
Farrow v. John R. Thompson Co.
137 So. 604
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
25 , 69 A. 1124 , 21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 464; Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 47 R. I. 165, 131 A. 194 ; , 35 So.
-
Kelly v. Pippitone
126 So. 79
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
83 , ; City of Shreveport vs. Simon et al., 132 La.
- Kohn v. Bellott 125 So. 269 La. 1929
-
Bomar v. City of Baton Rouge
110 So. 497
La. 1926
74 , , has no pertinent application to tbe facts of this case.
-
Bomar v. City of Baton Rouge
4 La. App. 232
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
The district judge to a large extent rested his opinion on the decision reported in Lawson vs. Shreveport Waterworks Co., , 35 South.
- Allain v. Frigola 74 So. 404 La. 1917
-
Baucum v. Pine Woods Lumber Co.
57 So. 577
La. 1912
852 , 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1161, where this court held, quoting from syllabus: “The owner of a wharf which has collapsed while being put to the use for which it was intended is responsible in damages to those who were legitimately on it at the time and were injured.” , 35 South.