Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McCoy, 33 So. 730.
- State v. Muse 319 So. 2d 920 La. 1975
- State v. McCauley 272 So. 2d 335 La. 1973
- State v. Giordano 249 So. 2d 558 La. 1971
- State v. Oliphant 56 So. 2d 846 La. 1952
-
State v. Oliphant
56 So. 2d 846
La. 1952
We do not consider that he would have made a good juror, and are of opinion that the challenge for cause should have been sustained.” , 33 So.
-
Baker v. Baker
26 So. 2d 132
La. 1946
680 , ]: “ * * * parol evidence is admissible to prove the fraud or error alleged; * * * tlie plaintiff may show that by fraud or by error the written instrument was made to embody a different agreement from that entered into by the parties, or that, by the fraud of defendant, the plaintiff was made to agree to something th
- State v. Guillory 9 So. 2d 450 La. 1942
- State v. Breedlove 7 So. 2d 221 La. 1941
- State v. Henry 3 So. 2d 104 La. 1941
- Simmons v. Victory Industrial Life Ins. Co. 139 So. 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- State v. Birbiglia 88 So. 533 La. 1920
-
State v. Guillory
83 So. 754
La. 1920
i The ruling of the district judge in this case cannot be reconciled with the ruling of this court, on a similar statement of facts, , 33 South.
-
Robinson v. Britton
69 So. 282
La. 1915
398 (in which the language above quoted from the opinion in Godwin v. Neustadtl was reiterated), , 33 South.