Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lawler v. Bradford, 37 So. 12.
- Nitro Energy, L.L.C. v. Nelson Energy, Inc. 34 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- Bostick v. Foret 351 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
- Wood v. Morvant 321 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
- Pitre v. Peltier 122 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
-
Bruce v. Cheramie
93 So. 2d 202
La. 1956
In support thereof plaintiff cites: , 37 So.
- Emerson v. Cotton 26 So. 2d 16 La. 1946
-
W. B. Thompson & Co. v. McNair
7 So. 2d 184
La. 1942
Plaintiff relies on the following cases in support of its demand for the reformation of the instruments referred to in its petition: , 37 So.
- Keller v. Summers 187 So. 69 La. 1939
- Tennent v. Caffery 129 So. 128 La. 1930
- Bodcaw Lumber Co. of Louisiana, Inc. v. Clifton Heirs 126 So. 52 La. 1930
- Lee v. Long 118 So. 320 La. 1928
-
Frantom v. Nelson
77 So. 767
La. 1918
< • “Where reference is made in an act of sale of real estate, to the title under which the vendor holds, both acts should be consulted, and taken together, to ascertain the true description of the property.” , 37 South.
-
Ganucheau v. Monnot
58 So. 150
La. 1912
The property intended to be transferred is, however, completely identified by the following addition to the description: “Being the same property which was acquired by said A. L. Monnot from A. Dumartrait by act of sale passed before Jules P. Robin, notary public, on the - day of -.” As to the effect of this additional description, , 37 South.