Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Buechner v. City of New Orleans, 36 So. 603.

57 citing documents.

Lee v. Peerless Insurance Company 183 So. 2d 328 La. 1966
Gomez v. Granberry 89 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Lobell ex rel. Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Neal 48 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
International Paper v. Arkansas Louisiana M.R. Co. 35 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
v. City of New Orleans, , 36 So.
Randazzo v. Meraux 27 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1946
v. City of New Orleans, , 36 So.
Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission 12 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1943
v. City of New Orleans, , 36 So.
Succession of Giordano 194 So. 577 La. 1940
Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 191 So. 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
v. City of New Orleans, , 36 So.
Overruled Loprestie v. Roy Motors, Inc. 185 So. 11 La. 1938
tived his own negligence, and (2) that he should also have alleged that the driver of the following car was guilty of negligence "in terms.” (1) The doctrine that plaintiff in actions for personal injuries must allege and prove that he was without contributory fault was overruled in so far as it has been recognized in the jurisprudence of Louisiana, , 36 So.
Oliphant v. Town of Lake Providence 193 So. 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Robinson v. City of Alexandria 174 So. 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Iglesias v. Campbell 175 So. 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
v. City of New Orleans, , 36 So.
Saks v. Eichel 167 So. 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
v. City of New Orleans, , 36 So.
Yancey v. Maestri 155 So. 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
602 , , 66 L. R. A. 334, 104 Am.
Miller v. City of New Orleans 152 So. 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Dinet v. Orleans Dredging Co., Inc. 149 So. 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Brown v. Wade 145 So. 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Monkhouse v. Johns 142 So. 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
509 , , 66 L. R. A. 334, 104 Am.
Bridwell v. Butler 139 So. 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Pepper v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 137 So. 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Neuman v. Eddy 130 So. 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
The burden of proof was upon intervener to show that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, , 36 So.
Preto v. Craven 128 So. 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Shields v. Succession of Hodge 128 So. 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Buechner et ux vs. City of New Orleans, , 36 So.
Thomas v. Shreveport Railways Co. 13 La. App. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Buechner vs. New Orleans, , 36 So.
Kern v. Knight 127 So. 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Sears v. Interurban Transp. Co. 125 So. 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Jacoby v. Gallaher 126 So. 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
914 ; Buechner vs. City of New Orleans, , 36 So.
Nolan v. City of Shreveport 7 La. App. 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
While the plaintiff does not allege that she exercised ordinary care in crossing the street, counsel do not cite any authority holding that such an allegation was necessary, and in Buechner vs. City of New Orleans, , 36 So.
Wright v. Petty 7 La. App. 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
King v. Jamstremski 6 La. App. 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Buechner vs. New Orleans, , 36 South.
Rousseau v. Texas & Pacific 4 La. App. 691 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1926
So in Buschner and Wife vs. City, , 36 South.
Fisher v. Pfeifer & Co. 4 La. App. 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
490 ; Buechener vs. City of New Orleans, , 36 South.
Belden v. Roberts 3 La. App. 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
322 ; Buechner vs. City of New Orleans, , 36 South.
Howard v. City of New Orleans 105 So. 443 La. 1925
Baldwin v. Consumers Electric Light & Power Co. 2 La. App. 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
1419, 1514; Beuchner vs. City of New Orleans, , 36 South.
Wiltz v. City of New Orleans 2 La. App. 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
891 ; Buechner vs. City of New Orleans, 605 , 36 South.
Jameson v. Standard Oil Co. 2 La. App. 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Buechner vs. City of New Orleans, , 36 South.
Armour Packing Co. v. Walker Price Oil Co. 1 La. App. 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
513 , the court says: “The defendant’s plea of contributory negligence, however, is a special defense; the burden of proof of which is shifted to the defendant when the plaintiff proves prima facie that the injury resulted from defendant’s negligence.” It cites several decisions in support of this proposition, amongst which is Buechner vs. City of N. O., , 36 South.
Nash v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. 96 So. 14 La. 1923
Selser v. Revol 93 So. 675 La. 1922
Abadie v. Orleans-Kenner Traction Co. 6 Pelt. 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1922
334 ,(338); ; 29 Cyc 601 (b); 20 C. J. 383.
Lemoine v. City of Alexandria 92 So. 58 La. 1922
Hebert v. Baton Rouge Electric Co. 91 So. 406 La. 1922
v. City of New Orleans, , 36 South.
Clogher v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. 78 So. 247 La. 1917
Defendant does not plead contributory negligence, a defense which should be specially pleaded ( , 36 South.
Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 72 So. 513 La. 1916
Weiss v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. 62 So. 216 La. 1913
The learned counsel asked the judge to charge the jury that in actions for personal injuries the burden is on the defendant to show- that plaintiff wás guilty of contributory negligence, , 36 South.
Cassady v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 60 So. 15 La. 1912
Roby v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 58 So. 701 La. 1912
Weekly v. Louisiana Western R. 56 So. 889 La. 1911
As to the quantum of damages, , 36 South.
Christy v. Tremont Lumber Co. 55 So. 754 La. 1911