No. 14,962 Precedential .Affirmed.. Processed

State v. Stover

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed November 16, 1903 · 35 So. 405

Cited by

State v. Smith 71 So. 734 La. 1916
State v. Gremillion 68 So. 615 La. 1915
State v. Anderson 66 So. 966 La. 1914
State v. Green 54 So. 45 La. 1911
State v. Anderson 51 So. 846 La. 1910

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

5 La. Ann. 185 not in our corpus
State v. Walters 16 La. Ann. 400
31 La. Ann. 147 not in our corpus
State v. Hypolite Polite 33 La. Ann. 1016
State v. Kane 33 La. Ann. 1269
State v. Johnson 35 La. Ann. 842
State v. Hamilton 48 La. Ann. 1566
50 La. Ann. 1348 not in our corpus
State v. Ackerman 51 La. Ann. 1213

Opinion text

NICHOLLS, C. J. The’only question presented to us for decision is whether under the indictment found on the 10th day of July, 1903, charging that the defendant, in the parish of Red River, did on the 1st day of May, 1903, unlawfully keep a grog and tippling *93 shop, and. then and there retail spirituous liquors, without previously obtaining a license, it was permissible for the state to introduce evidence that the accused had done so some time in the middle of May, 1903. Under the authority of section 1063 of the Revised Statutes of 1876, and repeated decisions of this court, this question must be answered in the affirmative, and this answer carried with it the affirmance of the judgment appealed from. See State v. Aqudo et al., 5 La. Ann. 185 ; State v. Walters, 16 La. Ann. 400 ; State v. Wallman, 31 La. Ann. 147 ; State v. Polite, 33 La. Ann. 1016 ; State v. Kane, 33 La. Ann. 1269 ; State v. Johnson, 35 La. Ann. 842 ; State v. Hamilton, 48 La. Ann. 1566 , 21 South. 232 ; State v. Hardaway, 50 La. Ann. 1348 , 24 South. 320 ; State v. Ackerman, 51 La. Ann. 1213 , 26 South. 80 . The judgment appealed from is affirmed.