DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., Inc., 146 So. 690.

15 citing documents.

  • Thompson v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc. 419 So. 2d 822 La. 1982
    634 , and Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., La.App., .
  • Welch v. Travelers Insurance Company 225 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    See Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., La.App., ; McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., supra, and Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Company, La.App., ; and Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co., 218 La.
  • Mattel v. Pittman Construction Co. 174 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    677 , (1951); McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 199 So.
  • Woodham v. Travelers Insurance Company 161 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., Inc., La.App., ; McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., 199 So.
  • Brooks v. Griggs Casing Crews, Inc. 136 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Orleans, 1933, ; McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App.
  • Cobb v. International Paper Company 76 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., Inc., La.App., ; McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., 199 So.
  • Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co. 50 So. 2d 803 La. 1951
    634 , and Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., La.App., .
  • Smith v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board 21 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
  • Williams v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. 19 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., La.App., , McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., 199 So.
  • Gillis v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 14 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
    of the widow, the defendant company took the position that, since its liability to her had been terminated under paragraph (F) of subsection 2 of section 8 of the Act, the abatement had the effect of relieving it of the obligation of paying the maximum compensation of $20 per week to the employee's children and that, inasmuch as it had been decided in Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., La.App., ; Britt v. Nashville Bridge Co., La.App., 171 So.
  • Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York 7 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    Co., La.App., ; Id., La.App., 167 So.
  • Pointe Coupee Electric M. Corporation v. Pettey 6 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    The distribution of the 46 1/4% made by the district judge in this case by allowing the widow 32 1/2% and awarding the minor the remaining 13 3/4% of the wages was proper and appears to be in line with the awards made in the somewhat similar cases of Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Company, La.App., and Britt v. Nashville Bridge Company, La.App., 171 So.
  • McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 199 So. 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    634 , and Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., La.App., .
  • Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co. 167 So. 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    The facts in this case are fully stated in our opinion rendered when the matter was first before us ( 699 ).
  • Abood v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp. 155 So. 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    App.) , in distinguishing the Durrett Case, the court, we think, is mistaken when it says: “In the Dur-rett Case the court finally concluded that the contract was entered into in Mississippi, after defendants had permanently left the state of Louisiana and located in Mississippi.” We understand the court to say in the