DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Perrin v. Rodriguez, 153 So. 555.

23 citing documents.

  • Rajnowski v. St. Patrick's Hosp. 564 So. 2d 671 La. 1990
    Despite the fact that contra non valentem was a doctrine of general applicability to the law of liberative prescription, its application to medical malpractice cases was recognized in only two cases prior to 1975, and Steel v. Aetna Life & Cas., writ denied, (1975).
  • Bunge Corp. v. Gatx Corp. 557 So. 2d 1376 La. 1990
  • Lynch v. Foster 376 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    2 Cir. 1978), writ denied, ; (La.App.Orl.
  • Lambert v. Michel 364 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    *251 (La.App.orl.1934); (La.App.
  • McClendon v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections 357 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    On this same point is the later case of Perrin v. Rodriguez, La.App., (Orl.App., 1934) involving a medical malpractice suit which held that it was not until the plaintiff had changed physicians that he learned that his trouble was due to his former physician's (Rodriguez) negligence.
  • Brown v. State, Through Dept. of Correction 354 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    [2] Perrin v. Rodriguez, La.App., (4th Cir., 1934); Lucas v. Commercial Union Insurance Co., La.App., (1st Cir., 1967); Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 255 La.
  • Couvillion v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 328 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Duhon v. Saloom 323 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Marcel v. Hospital Corp. of Sisters of Saint Joseph 322 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Neyrey v. Lebrun 309 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
  • Lemoine v. Avoyelles Farmers Co-Op 307 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Hunter v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF INCANATE WORD 236 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Plaintiffs maintain that Perrin v. Rodriguez, La.App., , and R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Hudson, 5 Cir., 314 F.2d 776 , are authority for the proposition that prescription does not run against a tort action until the injured plaintiff becomes aware that his injuries resulted from defendant's alleged negligence.
  • Dagenhart v. Robertson Truck Lines, Inc. 230 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    On this same point is the later case of Perrin v. Rodriguez, La.App., (Orl.App., 1934) involving a medical malpractice suit which held that it was not until the plaintiff had changed physicians that he learned that his trouble was due to his former physician's (Rodriguez) negligence.
  • Lucas v. Commercial Union Insurance Company 198 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Appellant also cites and relies upon Perrin v. Rodriguez, et al., La.App., , and McLaughlin v. Western Union Telegraph Company, 5 Cir., 17 F.2d 574 , in support of the contention that prescription does not begin to run on an action in tort until the injured party becomes aware of his injuries.
  • Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing Corporation 199 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    (Italics ours) The Walter case, supra, has been cited with approval by the Second Circuit Court of Appeal in the case of Youngblood v. Burke [La.App.], , , Orleans Court of Appeal (1934) wherein the following language is found: `A defendant who either intentionally or unknowingly `succeeds in concealing from a creditor his cause of action cannot be allowed to reap the benefit of his own wrong.'
  • Springer v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 169 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
  • Phelps v. Donaldson 142 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    App., , the court observed: "It is the nature of the duty breached that should determine whether the action is in tort or in contract.
  • Mills v. Doty 116 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    In support of plaintiff’s position, he cites and relies upon the authority of Perrin v. Rodriguez, La.App., , and urges that prescription did not begin to run until he was informed by Doctor Banks of the alleged actionable wrong committed by the defendant.
  • Aegis Insurance Co. v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co. 99 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    *783 Plaintiff also relies upon the case of Perrin v. Rodriguez, La.App., .
  • Fairley v. Douglas 76 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    In Perrin v. Rodriguez, La.App., and Comeaux v. Miles, 9 La.App.
  • Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. 61 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    We have no doubt of the correctness of this conclusion, and we refer to it only because, in Perrin v. Rodriguez, La.App., , we found that there had been negligence in failing to remove all of the broken parts of the tooth from the patient, but we did so because, in that case, it had been "conceded" by counsel.
  • Home Ins. Co. v. Highway Ins. Underwriters 52 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    lists some of these so-called exceptions in its second syllabus as follows: “ ‘2.
  • Brashears v. Peak 19 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    In the light of the testimony on the question of negligence in the case before us, , the Court of Appeal, Orleans Parish, had under consideration a case in which, as is stated in the opinion, "it is conceded that it is negligent for a dentist who removes a tooth to allow any part to remain in the mouth of the patient."