DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, Inc., 150 So. 79.

17 citing documents.

  • May v. Huey 116 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    670 ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, Inc., La.App., ; Pugh v. Henritzy, La.App., 151 So.
  • Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance 111 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    249 ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, Inc., La.App., ; Pugh v. Henritzy, La.App., 151 So.
  • Montalbano v. Hall 108 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    668 ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, La.App., ; Hamilton v. Lee, La.App., 144 So.
  • Commercial Credit Corporation v. Morris 107 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    670 ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, La.App., ; Pugh v. Henritzy, La.App., 151 So.
  • Youngblood v. Allstate Insurance Co. 98 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Pugh v. Henritzy (La.App.)
  • Keith v. Royal Indemnity Company 90 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    Pugh v. Henritzy (La.App.)
  • Martin v. Adams 88 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    670 ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, Inc., La.App., ; Pugh v. Henritzy, La.App., 151 So.
  • Leonard v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd. 84 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Co., La.App., ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, Inc., La.App., .
  • Sullivan v. Locke 73 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    670 ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab Company (La.App.), ; Pugh v. Henritzy (La.App.), 151 So.
  • New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co. v. Bush 68 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    See: Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, La.App.1933, ; Bagley v. Standard Coffee Co., La.App.
  • Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co. 169 So. 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    Pugh v. Henritzy (La.App.)
  • Millet v. Consolidated Companies, Inc. 160 So. 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    we discussed the extent of protection afforded to the “right-of-way” and quoted with approval from Kerns v. Lewis, 246 Mich.
  • Upton v. Bell Cabs, Inc. 154 So. 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    App.) ; Kerns v. Lewis, 246 Mich.
  • Sewell v. Newton 152 So. 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    App.) ; Johnson v. Item Company, Ltd., 10 La.
  • Burthe v. Lee 152 So. 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    f New Orleans, No. 13,702, C. C. S. In subsection 3 of article V of that ordinance, it is provided that: “It shall be prima facie lawful for the driver of a vehicle to drive the same at a speed not exceeding * * * fifteen miles an hour * * * when approaching within fifty feet of and in traversing an intersection when the operator’s view is obstructed.” We said in Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, Inc., , 80: “While this provision, as we have stated, does not of itself make it unlawful for an operator
  • Holderith v. Zilbermann 151 So. 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    367, 368 , the Supreme-Court said: “The rule of law is that a person, is held to have seen that which he could have seen and should have seen.” In Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, Inc., (La.
  • Pugh v. Henritzy 151 So. 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    367, 368 , the Supreme Court said: “The rule of law is that a person is held to have seen that which he could have seen and should have seen.” In Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, Inc., , 80 in a case where the plaintiff admittedly had the right of way, we held (syllabus): “That motorist has statutory right of way at intersection does not justify blindly and recklessly dashing into path of on-coming disaster.” See, also, Thomas v. Roberts (La.