Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Holderith v. Zilbermann, 151 So. 670.

15 citing documents.

  • May v. Huey 116 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    147 ; Holderith v. Zilbermann, La.App., ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, Inc., La.App., 150 So.
  • Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance 111 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    668 ; Holderith v. Zilbermann, La,App., ; Sullivan v. Locke, La.App., , This court, in Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., 169 So.
  • Montalbano v. Hall 108 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    Holderith v. Zibermann, La.App., ; Pugh v. Henritzy, La.App., 151 So.
  • Commercial Credit Corporation v. Morris 107 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    Holderith v. Zilbermann, La.App., ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, La.App., 150 So.
  • Youngblood v. Allstate Insurance Co. 98 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Murphy v. Star Checker Cab Co. (La.App.)
  • Keith v. Royal Indemnity Company 90 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    Murphy v. Star Checker Cab Company (La.App.)
  • Martin v. Adams 88 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    Sullivan v. Locke, supra; Holderith v. Zilbermann, La.App., ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab, Inc., La.App., 150 So.
  • Sullivan v. Locke 73 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    Holderith v. Zilbermann (La.App.), ; Murphy v. Star Checker Cab Company (La.App.), 150 So.
  • Kientz v. Charles Dennery 17 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    v. Zilbermann et al., , we said: "* * * While it is true that the defendant Vasterling had the right of way under the traffic ordinance, neither the provisions of the traffic ordinance nor the general rules of negligence relieved him of the duty of maintaining an adequate lookout.
  • Criticized Epps v. Standard Supply Hardware Co. 4 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    v. Zilbermann, La.App., .
  • Prudhomme v. Continental Casualty Co. 169 So. 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    Murphy v. Star Checker Cab Company (La.App.)
  • Friede v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 156 So. 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
  • Favaza v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 154 So. 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    App.) ; Snider v. N. O. & C. R. R. Co., 48 La.
  • Upton v. Bell Cabs, Inc. 154 So. 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
  • Pugh v. Henritzy 151 So. 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    513 ; of this court, this day decided.