DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sewell v. Newton, 152 So. 389.

16 citing documents.

  • Carona v. State Farm Ins. Co. 458 So. 2d 1275 La. 1984
    (Orl.App.1934), Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
  • Cornish v. Freeman 451 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Orleans, 1934, , it was held that an unsuccessful suit against an insured who carried automobile liability insurance did not bar or preclude the injured party from bringing another suit against the insurer."
  • Kerner v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 172 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    App., ; ; Sewell v. Newton, La.App., ; U-Drive-It-Car Co. v. Texas Pipe Line Co., 14 La.App.
  • Burch v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 172 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Orleans, 1934, ; Brignac v. Fontenot et al., La.App.
  • Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION 141 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
  • Hughes Tool Co. v. Buras Transportation Co. 139 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    565 ; Sewell v. Newton, et al., La.App., ; and Meyer v. Rein, La.App., .
  • Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. 137 So. 2d 298 La. 1962
    A. C. Service, Inc. v. Porter, La.App., ; Smith v. Litton, La.App., ; Sewell v. Newton, La.App., ; U-Drive-It-Car Co. v. Texas Pipe Line Co., 14 La.App.
  • Ensminger v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. 134 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Art. 2097; Sewell v. Newton, et al., La.App.Orleans, 1934, ; Brignac v. Fontenot et al., La.
  • Hidalgo v. Dupuy 122 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
  • Martin v. Mud Supply Company 111 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    In Sewell v. Newton, La.App., , this court in effect said that Act No. 55 of 1930 (LSA-R.S.
  • Hart v. Hardgrave 103 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    Moreover, it was held in Sewell v. Newton, La.App., , that an unsuccessful suit against an insured who carried an automobile liability policy does not bar the injured party from bringing suit against the insurer under the provisions of Act 55 of 1930 (LSA-R.S.
  • Andrepont v. Ochsner 84 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    22:655; see also Sewell v. Newton, La.App., .
  • Murray v. Dupepe 75 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App., ; Sewell v. Newton, La.App., ; Hay v. American Motorists Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Golden v. Creole Delicacies 28 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Levy v. New Orleans Northeastern R. Co. 20 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    App., ; U-Drive-It-Car Co. v. Texas Pipe Line Co., 14 La.
  • Meyer v. Rein 18 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    Sewell v. Newton et al., La.App., , is relied upon by plaintiff as authority for this doctrine.