Gretna Machine & Iron Works, Inc. v. Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co.
Also decided on this docket: La., July 15, 1894 46 La. Ann. 1303; La., April 15, 1869 21 La. Ann. 264; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., July 1, 1965 176 So. 2d 836
Gretna Machine & Iron Works, Inc. v. Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co., 166 So. 2d 54 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964).
Cited by
- Brandt Glass Co. v. Trinity Universal Insurance 172 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Tunnage v. Eddy 42 So. 2d 382
Opinion text
REGAN, Judge (concurring). I concur in the majority opinion herein. However, the author hereof wishes to make it clear that this court has specifically refrained from passing on the merits of the question of the liability vel non of the Southern Pacific Company. The majority opinion has simply decided that the record did not contain sufficient evidence on which to predicate a summary judgment, such as the lease which existed between the Southern Pacific Company and the Southwestern Sugar and Molasses Company. I am also of the opinion that the rationale emanating from Tunnage v. Eddy, La.App., 42 So.2d 382 , in which case I was a member of the panel, is not applicable to the facts hereof.