Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Crawford v. Tampa Inter-Ocean S. S. Co., 155 So. 409.

13 citing documents.

Reed v. Calcasieu Paper Company 98 So. 2d 175 La. 1957
759 ; Crawford v. Tampa Inter-Ocean S. S. Co., Inc., La.App., .
Patterson v. Cargo Services 95 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Co., Inc., La.App., ; O'Donnell v. Fortuna Oil Co., 2 La.App.
French v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. 70 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
Or., 1934, ; Fredieu v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company, La.App.2d Cir., 1950, .
Johnson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 58 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
Or., 1934, ; Finley v. Texas Company, La.App.
Simmons v. Blair 194 So. 585 La. 1940
In the case of Crawford v. Tampa Inter-Ocean S. S. Co., Inc., , Court of Appeal, wherein the Court of Appeal made an exhaustive review of the prior jurisprudence, it appears that the surrounding conditions and circumstances in each case must be taken in consideration in determining whether or not the refusal to submit to an operation is reasonable or arbitrary.
Hall v. Mengel Co. 191 So. 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
We do not consider that the binding effect of this long list of cases has been modified or weakened in the least by the cases of Crawford v. Tampa Interocean S. S. Co., Inc., La.App., and Murphy v. Mutti, Inc. et al., La.App., 166 So.
Leday v. Lake Charles Pipe & Supply Co. 185 So. 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
See Crawford v. Tampa Inter-Ocean S. S. Company, Inc., La.App., , and cases there cited; also Murphy v. Mutti, Inc., et al., La.App., 166 So.
Murphy v. B. Mutti, Inc. 166 So. 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
), it is equally true that rarely indeed does there exist such practical certainty of success and freedom from danger and pain as will justify such a judgment.
Boughton v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York 165 So. 140 La. 1935
(and cases therein cited); Yarbrough v. Great American Indemnity Co. (La.App.)
Crawford v. T. Smith & Son, Inc. 162 So. 814 La. 1935
Finley v. Texas Co. 162 So. 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Yarbrough v. Great American Indemnity Co. 159 So. 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
usal during trial, and a tender would have been vain and idle; and, further, that mover’s conception of the law and jurisprudence existing - at the time of filing its answer was such that it believed that such an operation would not be ordered, even in the alternative, but that since filing said answer the Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans, , had held that where an operation is tendered, and if performed it would not be attended by grave danger, in fact would not be a serious operation, the inj
Crawford v. Tampa Interocean S. S. Co. 159 So. 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935