No. 15,173
Precedential
Affirmed.
Processed
State v. Boykin
State v. Boykin, 36 So. 607 (La. 1904).
Opinion text
PROYOSTY, J. We find in the record nothing calling for our attention, except a hill of exception reciting that the defendant moved for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was coñtrary to the law and the evidence, and that the court overruled the motion. Not being- informed wherein the ruling complained of was contrary to law, we cannot review it. Judgment affirmed.