Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sallier v. Bartley, 37 So. 6.

16 citing documents.

Verzwyvelt v. Armstrong-Ratterree, Inc. 463 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Womack v. Walsh 213 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Finley v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co. 16 So. 2d 839 La. 1944
12 (citing Revised Civil Code, Articles 3437, 3498); , 37 So.
Johnson v. Henderson 190 So. 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Bond v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 160 So. 406 La. 1935
Tremont Lumber Co. v. Powers & Critchett Lumber Co. 139 So. 12 La. 1931
Haas v. Currie 126 So. 547 La. 1930
Taylor v. Pailet 120 So. 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
357 : “Actual possession, once begun, is continued by mere civil possession so long as not ousted by a counter actual possession of one year.” *294 In Sallier vs. Bartley, , 37 So.
Industrial Lumber Co. v. Farque 111 So. 166 La. 1926
Leader Realty Co. v. Taylor 84 So. 648 La. 1920
Gray v. Edgar Lumber Co. 70 So. 877 La. 1916
“Actual possession of part of a tract of land, with title to the whole, is possession of the *909 whole: and civil possession, sufficient for the purposes of a possessory action, is preserved by the intention to possess, though the actual possession be terminated, and this, whether there be inclosures or not.” , 37 South.
Producers' Oil Co. v. Hanszen 61 So. 754 La. 1913
r were in actual occupancy of said land; but it claims that it is and was in actual occupancy of lot No. 1, as defined on the notes of surveyor Bristol, and that it is and was in constructive possession of the remainder of the land between the established meander line, and Jeems bayou on the east and north of said lot, which is an occupancy of the whole, , 37 South, 6 , and Jones v. Goss, 115 La.
Bartley v. Sallier 45 So. 593 La. 1908
Bernstine v. Leeper 43 So. 889 La. 1907
Mott v. Hopper 40 So. 921 La. 1906
Sallier v. St. Louis, W. & G. Ry. Co. 38 So. 868 La. 1905