Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Golden, 37 So. 757.
-
State v. Edwards
420 So. 2d 663
La. 1982
(Authority: State v. Golden , 37 So.
- State v. MacKie 352 So. 2d 1297 La. 1977
- State v. Dreher 118 So. 85 La. 1928
- State v. Jefferson 116 So. 391 La. 1928
-
State v. Williams
110 So. 766
La. 1926
800 , .” Under the circumstances of this case, we are unable to see wherein the ruling of the trial judge worked any injustice upon the-defendant or constituted an abuse of his legal discretion in matters of continuance.
- State v. Doty 104 So. 736 La. 1925
- State v. Bourgeois 104 So. 627 La. 1925
-
State v. Poole
100 So. 613
La. 1924
422 ; , 37 South 757 ; State v. Craft, 118 La.
- State v. Sandiford 90 So. 261 La. 1921
- Followed State v. Boudreaux 68 So. 422 La. 1915
- State v. Richard 53 So. 669 La. 1910
-
State v. Tomsa
52 So. 988
La. 1910
In both the Golden Case, , 37 South.
- State v. Miller 51 So. 189 La. 1909
- State v. Davis 48 So. 771 La. 1909
- State v. Simmons 46 So. 651 La. 1908
- State v. Lively 44 So. 128 La. 1907
-
State v. Feazell
40 So. 698
La. 1906
It is true, where-all the evidence touching the question of overt act is before us, we will review the ruling of the trial judge, , 37 South.
- State v. Gallo 39 So. 1001 La. 1905